Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Gans, Emma A. [1 ,2 ]
van Mun, Liza A. M. [2 ]
de Groot, Janke F. [2 ]
van Munster, Barbara C. [1 ]
Rake, Ester A. [2 ]
van Weert, Julia C. M. [3 ]
Festen, Suzanne [1 ]
van den Bos, Frederiek [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Ctr Geriatr Med, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Knowledge Inst Dutch Assoc Med Specialists, Mercatorlaan 1200, NL-3528 BL Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gerontol & Geriatr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Medical decision making; Shared decision making; Decision aid; Decision support tool; Communication; Gerontology; Geriatrics; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ADULTS; MEDICINE; VIDEO; INTERVENTION; CHOICE; CANCER; TOOL; CPR;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2023.107981
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically review randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Decision Aids (DAs) compared to usual care or alternative interventions for older patients facing treatment, screening, or care decisions.Methods: A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies included patients >= 65 years or reported a mean of >= 70 years. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice made and decision making process, user experience and ways in which DAs were tailored to older patients. Meta-analysis was conducted, if possible, or outcomes were synthesized descriptively.Results: Overall, 15 studies were included. Using DAs were effective in increasing knowledge (SMD 0.90; 95% CI [0.48, 1.32]), decreasing decisional conflict (SMD -0.15; 95% CI [-0.29, -0.01]), improving patient-provider communication (RR 1.67; 95% CI [1.21, 2.29]), and preparing patients to make an individualized decision (MD 35.7%; 95% CI [26.8, 44.6]). Nine studies provided details on how the DA was tailored to older patients.Conclusion: This review shows a number of favourable results for the effectiveness of DAs in decision making with older patients.Practice implications: Current DAs can be used to support shared decision making with older patients when faced with treatment, screening or care decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of patient decision aids in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zimeng
    Jin, Yinghui
    Lu, Cui
    Luo, Ruzhen
    Wang, Jiayao
    Liu, Yanhui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (06)
  • [42] Lung cancer screening completion among patients using decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Antigua-Made, Alexander
    Nguyen, Sabrina
    Rashidi, Ali
    Chen, Wen-Pin
    Ziogas, Argyrios
    Sadigh, Gelareh
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2025,
  • [43] Effectiveness of integrating primary healthcare in aftercare for older patients after discharge from tertiary hospitals-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Ran
    Geng, Jiawei
    Liu, Jibin
    Wang, Gaoren
    Hesketh, Therese
    AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (06)
  • [44] Effectiveness of Therapeutic Education in Patients with Cancer Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gonzalez-Martin, Ana Maria
    Aguilera-Garcia, Ivan
    Castellote-Caballero, Yolanda
    Rivas-Campo, Yulieth
    Bernal-Suarez, Antonio
    Aibar-Almazan, Agustin
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (16)
  • [45] Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: a systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    Jammal, Walid
    Chiarelli, Pauline
    Gardiner, Robert A.
    Hughes, Suzanne
    Stefanovic, Dana
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1303 - 1315
  • [46] Decision aid tools to support women's decision making in pregnancy and birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dugas, Marylene
    Shorten, Allison
    Dube, Eric
    Wassef, Maggy
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Chaillet, Nils
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 74 (12) : 1968 - 1978
  • [47] Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elias, Sabrina
    Chen, Yuling
    Liu, Xiaoyue
    Slone, Sarah
    Turkson-Ocran, Ruth-Alma
    Ogungbe, Bunmi
    Thomas, Sabena
    Byiringiro, Samuel
    Koirala, Binu
    Asano, Reiko
    Baptiste, Diana-Lyn
    Mollenkopf, Nicole L.
    Nmezi, Nwakaego
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R. Dennison
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (03)
  • [48] Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kashaf, Michael Saheb
    McGill, Elizabeth Tyner
    Berger, Zackary Dov
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (12) : 2159 - 2171
  • [49] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Considerations for Evidence-Informed Decision Making
    Palisano, Robert J.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 35 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [50] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Decision Aids for Socially Disadvantaged Populations: Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IDPAS)
    Yen, Renata W.
    Smith, Jenna
    Engel, Jaclyn
    Muscat, Danielle Marie
    Smith, Sian K.
    Mancini, Julien
    Perestelo-Perez, Lilisbeth
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Malley, A. James
    Leyenaar, JoAnna K.
    Mac, Olivia
    Cadet, Tamara
    Giguere, Anik
    Housten, Ashley J.
    Langford, Aisha
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2021, 41 (07) : 870 - 896