Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Gans, Emma A. [1 ,2 ]
van Mun, Liza A. M. [2 ]
de Groot, Janke F. [2 ]
van Munster, Barbara C. [1 ]
Rake, Ester A. [2 ]
van Weert, Julia C. M. [3 ]
Festen, Suzanne [1 ]
van den Bos, Frederiek [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Ctr Geriatr Med, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Knowledge Inst Dutch Assoc Med Specialists, Mercatorlaan 1200, NL-3528 BL Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Sch Commun Res ASCoR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gerontol & Geriatr, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Medical decision making; Shared decision making; Decision aid; Decision support tool; Communication; Gerontology; Geriatrics; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ADULTS; MEDICINE; VIDEO; INTERVENTION; CHOICE; CANCER; TOOL; CPR;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2023.107981
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically review randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of Decision Aids (DAs) compared to usual care or alternative interventions for older patients facing treatment, screening, or care decisions.Methods: A systematic search of several databases was conducted. Eligible studies included patients >= 65 years or reported a mean of >= 70 years. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice made and decision making process, user experience and ways in which DAs were tailored to older patients. Meta-analysis was conducted, if possible, or outcomes were synthesized descriptively.Results: Overall, 15 studies were included. Using DAs were effective in increasing knowledge (SMD 0.90; 95% CI [0.48, 1.32]), decreasing decisional conflict (SMD -0.15; 95% CI [-0.29, -0.01]), improving patient-provider communication (RR 1.67; 95% CI [1.21, 2.29]), and preparing patients to make an individualized decision (MD 35.7%; 95% CI [26.8, 44.6]). Nine studies provided details on how the DA was tailored to older patients.Conclusion: This review shows a number of favourable results for the effectiveness of DAs in decision making with older patients.Practice implications: Current DAs can be used to support shared decision making with older patients when faced with treatment, screening or care decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of health coaching on diabetic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Radwan, Nashwa Mohamed
    Al Khashan, Hisham
    Alamri, Fahad
    El Olemy, Ahmed Tofek
    TRADITIONAL MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2019, 4 (06): : 314 - 325
  • [32] Interventions to Support Adolescents With Cancer in Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Li-Min
    Huang, I-Chin
    Su, Hsiu-Lan
    Lee, Shu-Li
    WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 2021, 18 (06) : 339 - 349
  • [33] Effectiveness of combined exercise and nutrition interventions in prefrail or frail older hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Chad Yixian
    Miller, Michelle
    Yaxley, Alison
    Baldwin, Claire
    Woodman, Richard
    Sharma, Yogesh
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [34] Effects of decision aids on breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Yang, Shu
    Yu, Lin
    Zhang, Chunmiao
    Xu, Mengmeng
    Tian, Qi
    Cui, Xuan
    Liu, Yantong
    Yu, Shuanghan
    Cao, Minglu
    Zhang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (7-8) : 1025 - 1044
  • [35] Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ivlev, Ilya
    Jerabkova, Silvie
    Mishra, Meenakshi
    Cook, Lily A.
    Eden, Karen B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 55 (06) : 896 - 907
  • [36] The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis
    Scalia, Peter
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    Berkowitz, Julia L.
    Ramesh, Nithya P.
    Faber, Marjan J.
    Kremer, Jan A. M.
    Elwyn, Glyn
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (05) : 817 - 841
  • [37] Impact of Decision Aids on Screening Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis
    Adeli, Mahin
    Zayeri, Farid
    Rasekhi, Aliakbar
    Kiani, Zahra
    Amini, Payam
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 26 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [38] Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review
    Davies, Nathan
    Schiowitz, Brooke
    Rait, Greta
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 (10) : 1403 - 1419
  • [39] Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Volk, Robert J.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Saraykar, Smita S.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 779 - 791
  • [40] Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening Choice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Riikonen, Jarno M.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Kilpelainen, Tuomas P.
    Craigie, Samantha
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Agoritsas, Thomas
    Couban, Rachel
    Dahm, Philipp
    Jarvinen, Petrus
    Montori, Victor
    Power, Nicholas
    Richard, Patrick O.
    Rutanen, Jarno
    Santti, Henrikki
    Tailly, Thomas
    Violette, Philippe D.
    Zhou, Qi
    Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (08) : 1072 - 1082