Sulfur fertilization effects on protein concentration and yield of wheat: A meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Castellari, Maria Paula [1 ]
Poffenbarger, Hanna J. [1 ]
Van Sanford, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
关键词
Sulfur fertilizer; Protein concentration; Wheat; Moderator variables; GRAIN-YIELD; NITROGEN; QUALITY; PLANT; SOIL; PHOSPHORUS; EFFICIENCY; POTASSIUM; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109061
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has a low sulfur (S) requirement compared with other macronutrients, such as nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), and similar to that of magnesium (Mg), phosphorus (P) or calcium (Ca). However, a lack of this nutrient can affect yield and protein concentration and composition, determining the characteristics of the flour. Sulfur deficiency in cropping systems is increasingly reported worldwide, but the effects of S fertilizer are inconsistent among studies depending upon genotype, environment, and management factors. Therefore, our goals were to analyze the results from published studies through a meta-analysis to quantify the effect of S fertilizer on protein concentration and yield of wheat, and to identify environmental, genotypic and management factors behind the response of protein concentration and yield to S fertilizer. This meta-analysis summarizes 22 studies reporting protein concentration, from which 15 also reported yield, most of them published in the 2000's. We calculated the effect size as the natural log of the response ratio, with the response ratio determined as protein concentration (or yield) with S fertilizer application relative to protein concentration (or yield) without S fertilizer application. On average, S fertilizer increased protein concentration by 5.4 % and yield by 16.2 %. Sulfur fertilizer impact on protein concentration and yield increased with the relatively low soil S levels of our dataset (under 7.20 mg S kg-1), under wet weather conditions (above historical precipitation average), no-till practices, or following legumes. Furthermore, ensuring a balanced nutrition by the co-application of N was a determining factor in achieving a response to S fertilizer, which increased with higher N rates. Interestingly, we found a consistent positive response to S fertilizer for yield among all bread-making quality categories, and only a positive response for protein in high and low breadmaking quality, but not in the medium quality category. Overall, this meta-analysis provides an extensive evaluation of protein and yield response to S fertilization in wheat, and how these responses are influenced by genotypic, environmental, and management factors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative Protein Composition and Baking Quality of Winter Wheat as Affected by Late Sulfur Fertilization
    Zoerb, Christian
    Steinfurth, Dorothee
    Seling, Simone
    Langenkaemper, Georg
    Koehler, Peter
    Wieser, Herbert
    Lindhauer, Meinolf G.
    Muehling, Karl H.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (09) : 3877 - 3885
  • [42] Responses of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: A meta-analysis of field studies from 1975 to 2013
    Pellegrino, Elisa
    Oepik, Maarja
    Bonari, Enrico
    Ercoli, Laura
    SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 84 : 210 - 217
  • [43] Optimising durum wheat cultivation in North Italy: understanding the effects of site-specific fertilization on yield and protein content
    Morari, F.
    Zanella, V.
    Sartori, L.
    Visioli, G.
    Berzaghi, P.
    Mosca, G.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2018, 19 (02) : 257 - 277
  • [44] Effects of manure fertilizer on crop yield and soil properties in China: A meta-analysis
    Du, Yadan
    Cui, Bingjing
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Zhen
    Sun, Jun
    Niu, Wenquan
    CATENA, 2020, 193
  • [45] A New Fertilization Approach for Bread Wheat in the Mediterranean Environment: Effects on Yield and Grain Protein Content
    Mathlouthi, Fakir
    Ruggeri, Roberto
    Rossini, Angelo
    Rossini, Francesco
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [46] Effects of growing environment, genotype, and commercial fertilization levels on free asparagine concentration in Western Canadian wheat
    Xie, Yi
    Malunga, Lovemore Nkhata
    Ames, Nancy P.
    Waterer, John
    Khorshidi, Ali Salimi
    Scanlon, Martin G.
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 98 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [47] Fertilization of peach for yield and quality, and optimization of nitrogen application rates in China: A meta-analysis
    Cai, Tingyao
    You, Luncheng
    Yang, Xue
    Hao, Shenglei
    Shao, Qi
    Wang, Haiyan
    Zhang, Qingsong
    Cui, Zhenling
    Chen, Yongliang
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2023, 313
  • [48] Effects of different fertilization practices on maize yield, soil nutrients, soil moisture, and water use efficiency in northern China based on a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Minghao
    Dong, Chao
    Bian, Wenpeng
    Zhang, Wenbei
    Wang, Yong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [49] Wastewater irrigation and crop yield: A meta-analysis
    Wang Han-jie
    Wang, Jingjing
    Yu, Xiaohua
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2022, 21 (04) : 1215 - 1224
  • [50] Enhancing lucerne (Medicago sativa) yield and nutritional quality: a meta-analysis of fertilization types and environmental factors in China
    Zhang, Jiachang
    Mao, Yanting
    Wang, Gang
    Luo, Dong
    Cao, Quan
    Siddique, Kadambot H. M.
    Mirzaei, Morad
    Saunders, Matthew
    Aghamir, Fateme
    Radicetti, Emanuele
    Xiang, Yangzhou
    Zhang, Qingping
    Li, Yuan
    Shen, Yuying
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15