Comparison of protein quality and digestibility between plant-based and meat-based burgers

被引:17
|
作者
Cutroneo, Sara [1 ]
Prandi, Barbara [1 ]
Faccini, Andrea [2 ]
Pellegrini, Nicoletta [3 ]
Sforza, Stefano [1 ]
Tedeschi, Tullia [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Food & Drug Dept, Parco Area Sci 27-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[2] Interdept Ctr Measurements, Parco Area Sci 23-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Parco Area Sci 17-A, I-43124 Parma, PR, Italy
关键词
Meat analogs; Protein digestibility; Protein quality; Amino acids; Plant -based burgers; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE CONTENT; NITROGEN; FOOD; FRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113183
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Nowadays, consumers are increasingly inclined toward plant-based meat analogues for sake of food security, safety, and sustainability. This growing interest, not only from consumers but also from food companies, brought the offer on the market to be wide and vast. From our previous study it emerged that the market supply, especially the Italian one, is diversified both in terms of protein sources and nutrient content. Although these products are increasingly consumed, for most of the meat analogues today on the market, little is still known about their actual protein quality and digestibility. To fill this gap, in this study different commercial plant-based burgers (2 soy-based and 2 pea-based) were selected and compared to two beef burgers, as controls, in terms of protein quality and digestibility. The findings of this study demonstrated the essential amino acidic profile lacks lysine for almost all burgers (including the meat-based ones) compared to the amino acid scoring pattern set by FAO/WHO (for older children and adults), even if the sum of essential amino acids was within the range of sufficiency. All samples showed good initial protein integrity with low hydrolysis (above 6%) and percentage of D-enantiomers (above 15%). The study of the digestibility, performed by the validated INFOGEST in vitro model, showed better protein solubilisation in the case of meat burgers (63 & PLUSMN; 3% and 61 & PLUSMN; 8%), but a good digestibility also in the case of plant-based ones (from 55% to 40%). The degree of hydrolysis of the solubilised proteins was very high in all samples (from 65% to 40%) indicating a very good protein accessibility to digestive enzymes. The analysis of the peptide fraction of digestates indicated a high prevalence of collagen proteins in beef burgers and of reserve proteins in plant-based burgers. This study showed that the differences between these products are mostly dependent on the quality of the raw materials used, rather than on the vegetal or animal protein source. Therefore, to have a product with a good protein quality and digestibility, independently from the protein origin, the consumer needs to make an accurate choice, carefully reading the ingredient list.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cultured meat on a plant-based frame
    Jette Feveile Young
    Stig Skrivergaard
    Nature Food, 2020, 1 : 195 - 195
  • [42] Cooking of meat and meat-based product: coupling with the reactions governing quality
    Kondjoyan, A.
    SCIENCES DES ALIMENTS, 2008, 28 (4-5) : 351 - 363
  • [43] Commercialization of Plant-Based Meat Alternatives
    Choudhury, Deepak
    Singh, Satnam
    Seah, Jasmine Si Han
    Yeo, David Chen Loong
    Tan, Lay Poh
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 25 (11) : 1055 - 1058
  • [44] Peptidomics comparison of plant-based meat alternatives and processed meat after in vitro digestion
    Xing, Zhuqing
    Li, Jiaying
    Zhang, Yating
    Gao, Ang
    Xie, Heran
    Gao, Zifan
    Chu, Xuan
    Cai, Yumeng
    Gu, Chunkai
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 158
  • [45] Emotional and sensory profiling of insect-, plant- and meat-based burgers under blind, expected and informed conditions
    Schouteten, Joachim J.
    De Steur, Hans
    De Pelsmaeker, Sara
    Lagast, Sofie
    Juvinal, Joel G.
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Verbeke, Wim
    Gellynck, Xavier
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2016, 52 : 27 - 31
  • [46] Technical Opportunities Associated with Producing Plant-based Meat Protein.
    Hermes, Tasha
    Metin, Serpil
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 2021, 98 : 75 - 75
  • [47] High-pressure processing and sous-vide cooking effects on physicochemical properties of meat-based, plant-based and hybrid patties
    Janardhanan, Rasmi
    Huerta-Leidenz, Nelson
    Ibanez, Francisco C.
    Jose Beriain, Maria
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 173
  • [48] An In Vitro Comparison of the Digestibility and Gastrointestinal Fate of Scallops and Plant-Based Scallop Analogs
    Zhang, Zhiyun
    Qin, Dingkui
    Kobata, Kanon
    Rao, Jiajia
    Lu, Jiakai
    McClements, David Julian
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [49] Digestibility of protein and estimated bioavailability of mineral compounds in plant-based yoghurt alternatives
    Zeinatulina, Anastassia
    Tanilas, Kristel
    Ehala-Aleksejev, Kristel
    Viiard, Ene
    Krisciunaite, Tiina
    FUTURE FOODS, 2025, 11
  • [50] Plant Protein and Plant-Based Meat Alternatives: Consumer and Nutrition Professional Attitudes and Perceptions
    Estell, Madeline
    Hughes, Jaimee
    Grafenauer, Sara
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 18