Comparison of protein quality and digestibility between plant-based and meat-based burgers

被引:17
|
作者
Cutroneo, Sara [1 ]
Prandi, Barbara [1 ]
Faccini, Andrea [2 ]
Pellegrini, Nicoletta [3 ]
Sforza, Stefano [1 ]
Tedeschi, Tullia [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Food & Drug Dept, Parco Area Sci 27-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[2] Interdept Ctr Measurements, Parco Area Sci 23-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Parco Area Sci 17-A, I-43124 Parma, PR, Italy
关键词
Meat analogs; Protein digestibility; Protein quality; Amino acids; Plant -based burgers; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE CONTENT; NITROGEN; FOOD; FRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113183
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Nowadays, consumers are increasingly inclined toward plant-based meat analogues for sake of food security, safety, and sustainability. This growing interest, not only from consumers but also from food companies, brought the offer on the market to be wide and vast. From our previous study it emerged that the market supply, especially the Italian one, is diversified both in terms of protein sources and nutrient content. Although these products are increasingly consumed, for most of the meat analogues today on the market, little is still known about their actual protein quality and digestibility. To fill this gap, in this study different commercial plant-based burgers (2 soy-based and 2 pea-based) were selected and compared to two beef burgers, as controls, in terms of protein quality and digestibility. The findings of this study demonstrated the essential amino acidic profile lacks lysine for almost all burgers (including the meat-based ones) compared to the amino acid scoring pattern set by FAO/WHO (for older children and adults), even if the sum of essential amino acids was within the range of sufficiency. All samples showed good initial protein integrity with low hydrolysis (above 6%) and percentage of D-enantiomers (above 15%). The study of the digestibility, performed by the validated INFOGEST in vitro model, showed better protein solubilisation in the case of meat burgers (63 & PLUSMN; 3% and 61 & PLUSMN; 8%), but a good digestibility also in the case of plant-based ones (from 55% to 40%). The degree of hydrolysis of the solubilised proteins was very high in all samples (from 65% to 40%) indicating a very good protein accessibility to digestive enzymes. The analysis of the peptide fraction of digestates indicated a high prevalence of collagen proteins in beef burgers and of reserve proteins in plant-based burgers. This study showed that the differences between these products are mostly dependent on the quality of the raw materials used, rather than on the vegetal or animal protein source. Therefore, to have a product with a good protein quality and digestibility, independently from the protein origin, the consumer needs to make an accurate choice, carefully reading the ingredient list.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultra-processing markers are more prevalent in plant-based meat products as compared to their meat-based counterparts in a German food market analysis
    Metz, Kemja-Maria
    Neumann, Nathalie Judith
    Fasshauer, Mathias
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2023, 26 (12) : 2728 - 2737
  • [32] Comparison of High Hydrostatic Pressure Processed Plus Sous-Vide Cooked Meat-Based, Plant-Based and Hybrid Patties According to Fat Replacement
    Janardhanan, Rasmi
    Gonzalez-Diez, Mikel
    Ibanez, Francisco C.
    Jose Beriain, Maria
    FOODS, 2022, 11 (22)
  • [33] Effect of technological treatments on digestibility and allergenicity of meat-based baby foods
    Restani, P
    Fiocchi, A
    Restelli, R
    Velonà, T
    Beretta, B
    Giovannini, M
    Galli, CL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF NUTRITION, 1997, 16 (04) : 376 - 382
  • [34] The meat of the matter: plant-based meat analogue versus traditional meat product nutritional quality
    Arshia Shireen
    Amanda J.Wright
    Food Science and Human Wellness, 2024, 13 (06) : 3110 - 3125
  • [35] Is there a role for meat in a plant-based diet?
    Binnie, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 438 - 438
  • [36] Advance and Challenges in Plant-based Meat
    Jiang L.
    Zhang X.
    Dou W.
    Sui X.
    Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2020, 20 (08) : 1 - 10
  • [37] Solving the problems of plant-based meat
    不详
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 77 (08) : 10 - 10
  • [38] The meat of the matter: plant-based meat analogue versus traditional meat product nutritional quality
    Shireen, Arshia
    Wright, Amanda J.
    FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN WELLNESS, 2024, 13 (06) : 3110 - 3125
  • [39] Cultured meat on a plant-based frame
    Young, Jette Feveile
    Skrivergaard, Stig
    NATURE FOOD, 2020, 1 (04): : 195 - 195
  • [40] The Flavor of Plant-Based Meat Analogues
    Li, Xuejie
    Li, Jian
    CEREAL FOODS WORLD, 2020, 65 (04)