Comparison of protein quality and digestibility between plant-based and meat-based burgers

被引:17
|
作者
Cutroneo, Sara [1 ]
Prandi, Barbara [1 ]
Faccini, Andrea [2 ]
Pellegrini, Nicoletta [3 ]
Sforza, Stefano [1 ]
Tedeschi, Tullia [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Food & Drug Dept, Parco Area Sci 27-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[2] Interdept Ctr Measurements, Parco Area Sci 23-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Parco Area Sci 17-A, I-43124 Parma, PR, Italy
关键词
Meat analogs; Protein digestibility; Protein quality; Amino acids; Plant -based burgers; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE CONTENT; NITROGEN; FOOD; FRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113183
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Nowadays, consumers are increasingly inclined toward plant-based meat analogues for sake of food security, safety, and sustainability. This growing interest, not only from consumers but also from food companies, brought the offer on the market to be wide and vast. From our previous study it emerged that the market supply, especially the Italian one, is diversified both in terms of protein sources and nutrient content. Although these products are increasingly consumed, for most of the meat analogues today on the market, little is still known about their actual protein quality and digestibility. To fill this gap, in this study different commercial plant-based burgers (2 soy-based and 2 pea-based) were selected and compared to two beef burgers, as controls, in terms of protein quality and digestibility. The findings of this study demonstrated the essential amino acidic profile lacks lysine for almost all burgers (including the meat-based ones) compared to the amino acid scoring pattern set by FAO/WHO (for older children and adults), even if the sum of essential amino acids was within the range of sufficiency. All samples showed good initial protein integrity with low hydrolysis (above 6%) and percentage of D-enantiomers (above 15%). The study of the digestibility, performed by the validated INFOGEST in vitro model, showed better protein solubilisation in the case of meat burgers (63 & PLUSMN; 3% and 61 & PLUSMN; 8%), but a good digestibility also in the case of plant-based ones (from 55% to 40%). The degree of hydrolysis of the solubilised proteins was very high in all samples (from 65% to 40%) indicating a very good protein accessibility to digestive enzymes. The analysis of the peptide fraction of digestates indicated a high prevalence of collagen proteins in beef burgers and of reserve proteins in plant-based burgers. This study showed that the differences between these products are mostly dependent on the quality of the raw materials used, rather than on the vegetal or animal protein source. Therefore, to have a product with a good protein quality and digestibility, independently from the protein origin, the consumer needs to make an accurate choice, carefully reading the ingredient list.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nutritional Quality of Plant-Based Meat and Dairy Imitation Products and Comparison with Animal-Based Counterparts
    Katidi, Alexandra
    Xypolitaki, Konstantina
    Vlassopoulos, Antonis
    Kapsokefalou, Maria
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [22] Digestibility and bioavailability of plant-based proteins intended for use in meat analogues: A review
    Shaghaghian, Samaneh
    McClements, David Julian
    Khalesi, Mohammadreza
    Garcia-Vaquero, Marco
    Mirzapour-Kouhdasht, Armin
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 646 - 656
  • [23] Comparison of environmental impacts of individual meals-Does it really make a difference to choose plant-based meals instead of meat-based ones?
    Takacs, Berill
    Stegemann, Julia A.
    Kalea, Anastasia Z.
    Borrion, Aiduan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [24] Nutritional and ingredient composition of plant-based substitutive burgers. Are they comparable to meat equivalents?
    Costa-Catala, J.
    Comas-Baste, O.
    Sanchez-Perez, S.
    Veciana-Nogues, M. T.
    Latorre-Moratalla, M. L.
    Castell-Garralda, M., V
    Vidal-Carou, M. C.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2022, 78 (SUPPL 3) : 25 - 25
  • [25] Evaluation of consumers' response to plant-based burgers according to their attitude towards meat reduction
    Moussaoui, D.
    Torres-Moreno, M.
    Tarrega, A.
    Marti, J.
    Lopez-Font, G.
    Chaya, C.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2023, 110
  • [26] Exploring the Role and Functionality of Ingredients in Plant-Based Meat Analogue Burgers: A Comprehensive Review
    Vila-Clara, Gil
    Vila-Marti, Anna
    Verges-Canet, Laia
    Torres-Moreno, Miriam
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [27] Structure analysis and quality evaluation of plant-based meat analogs
    Fu, Jialing
    Sun, Cuixia
    Chang, Yuyang
    Li, Saiya
    Zhang, Yin
    Fang, Yapeng
    JOURNAL OF TEXTURE STUDIES, 2023, 54 (03) : 383 - 393
  • [28] Research Status of Nutritional Quality of Plant-based Meat Substitutes
    Liu H.
    Zhang J.
    Chen Q.
    Zhang Y.
    Li T.
    Wang Q.
    Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2023, 23 (08) : 428 - 439
  • [29] Meat and plant-based meat analogs: Nutritional profile and in vitro digestion comparison
    Yang, Yuyan
    Zheng, Yixin
    Ma, Wenping
    Zhang, Yin
    Sun, Cuixia
    Fang, Yapeng
    FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS, 2023, 143
  • [30] Maillard reaction products and metabolite profile of plant-based meat burgers compared with traditional meat burgers and cooking-induced alterations
    Correia, Banny Silva Barbosa
    Jorkowski, Johanna
    Jakobsen, Louise Margrethe Arildsen
    Zacherl, Christian
    Bertram, Hanne Christine
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2024, 445