Co-creating end-user roles. Understanding the new variety of user involvement in public sector innovation

被引:5
作者
Lipp, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Baudrin, Mathieu [3 ]
Cuevas, Carlos [4 ]
Pepponi, Federica [4 ]
Rozwadowska, Magdalena [5 ]
Tsui, Shelly [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Sci & Innovat Studies, Von Melle Pk 5, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Sci & Technol Studies, 305 Morrill Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, Augustenstr 46, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[4] Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, Groene Loper 3, NL-5612 AE Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Wroclaw Univ Econ & Business, Fac Econ & Finance, 305 Morrill Hall, PL-14850 Wroclaw, Poland
[6] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, 305 Morrill Hall, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
co-creation; users; science and technology studies; innovation policy; public sector innovation; PROCUREMENT; CONSTRUCTION; CHALLENGES; DEMAND; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scac050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-creation has become a major concern in science and public policy. It aims to give a more central role to end users in producing (public sector) innovation outcomes. This leads to a new variety of end user roles in innovation activities and poses challenges for both practitioners and policy makers. We offer an in-depth, comparative analysis of such end user roles in three cases of co-creative public sector innovation across Europe. We argue that the definition of particular end user roles is crucial in shaping both the inclusiveness and outcomes of co-creative innovation. We offer a typology of end user roles and their respective limits and potentials with regard to co-creation. Our analysis suggests that, for co-creation to produce useful and legitimate outcomes, the process by which roles are assigned to and negotiated with end users must be part of the co-creative process itself.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 159
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Aho E., 2006, Aho Group Report
  • [2] Akrich M., 1995, MANAGING TECHNOLOGY, P167
  • [3] Akrich Madeleine, 1992, Shaping Technology, Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, P205
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, 1 ID ZIEN LICHT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, COMMUNICATION COMMIS
  • [6] LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
    ARNSTEIN, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04): : 216 - 224
  • [7] Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy
    Boon, Wouter
    Edler, Jakob
    [J]. SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 45 (04) : 435 - 447
  • [8] Brandsen T, 2018, ROUT ST PUBL MANAGE, P3
  • [9] Bryant A., 2011, The SAGE handbook of grounded theory
  • [10] Open innovation and strategy
    Chesbrough, Henry W.
    Appleyard, Melissa M.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 50 (01) : 57 - +