Process evaluation of PsyCovidApp, a digital tool for mobile devices aimed at protecting the mental health of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed method study

被引:0
作者
Fiol-deRoque, Maria A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mira-Martinez, Sofia [1 ]
Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Sitges, Carolina [1 ,7 ]
Garcia-Buades, M. Esther [7 ]
Gervilla, Elena [1 ,7 ]
Garcia-Toro, Mauro [1 ,3 ,7 ]
Zamanillo-Campos, Rocio [1 ,2 ]
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Res Inst Balearic Isl IdISBa, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
[2] Primary Care Res Unit Majorca, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
[3] Primary Care & Hlth Promot RICAPPS, Res Network Chron, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Andalusian Sch Publ Hlth, Granada, Spain
[5] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Epidemiol & Salud Publ, Madrid, Spain
[6] Granada Biosanit Res Inst, Granada, Spain
[7] Univ Balearic Isl, Palma De Mallorca, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
mixed methods; COVID-19; process evaluation; digital intervention; healthcare workers; mental health; WORKERS; INTERVENTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1378372
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Introduction: PsyCovidApp, a digital intervention aimed at safeguarding the mental health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial to yield significant improvements solely among healthcare workers undergoing psychotherapy or receiving psychotropic medication. Objectives: (1) To identify contextual factors and mechanisms of action that influenced the impact of PsyCovidApp during the aforementioned trial; (2) To pinpoint enhancements for optimizing its efficacy. Materials and methods: For the first objective, a process evaluation was conducted, amalgamating quantitative techniques (surveying 216 healthcare professionals who had utilized PsyCovidApp during the trial) and qualitative methods (in-depth interviews with 16 healthcare workers). The second objective involved a panel of seven experts, utilizing the RAND-UCLA methodology. Results: The quantitative study (response rate = 40%) revealed that 22% of respondents had not fully accessed the content of PsyCovidApp. The average usage time was 22.7 min/day, being higher (p < 0.05) among consumers of psychotropic medications. Contents related to relaxation and mindfulness were most highly rated. Acceptability and usefulness scores ranged between 7.3-7.5/10 points, with higher ratings (p < 0.05) among women and older healthcare workers. The qualitative study uncovered that the primary barriers to using PsyCovidApp were workload, lack of time, and exhaustion. Its primary mechanisms of action included emotion identification, mental health regulation (e.g., insomnia, intense emotions), and learning of techniques and skills. The expert panel reached a consensus on 29 proposals to optimize PsyCovidApp. Conclusion: The knowledge derived from this study could inform the design and implementation of future similar digital tools.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] A Mobile Phone-Based Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Problems in Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PsyCovidApp): Randomized Controlled Trial
    Antonia Fiol-DeRoque, Maria
    Jesus Serrano-Ripoll, Maria
    Jimenez, Rafael
    Zamanillo-Campos, Rocio
    Maria Yanez-Juan, Aina
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    Leiva, Alfonso
    Gervilla, Elena
    Esther Garcia-Buades, M.
    Garcia-Toro, Mauro
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe
    Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
    Sitges, Carolina
    Garcia-Campayo, Javier
    Llobera-Canaves, Joan
    Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (05):
  • [2] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [3] The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological well-being among health care workers: A 6-month cohort longitudinal survey study
    Canal-Rivero, Manuel
    Montes-Garcia, Cristian
    Garrido-Torres, Nathalia
    Moreno-Mellado, Amanda
    Reguera-Pozuelo, Pablo
    Ruiz-Veguilla, Miguel
    Crespo-Facorro, Benedicto
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2023, 16 : 25 - 37
  • [4] Chirico F., 2021, J Health Soc Sci, V6, P209, DOI DOI 10.19204/2021/PRVL7
  • [5] The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of of healthcare workers and the associated factors: A systematic review
    Cruz-Ausejo, Liliana
    Villarreal-Zegarra, David
    Reategui-Rivera, C. Mahony
    Burgos, Miguel
    Vilela-Estrada, Ana L.
    Castro, Gabriel
    Collantes, Hector
    Copez-Lonzoy, Anthony
    [J]. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL, 2023, 16 : 11 - 24
  • [6] Psychological Distress and COVID-19 Evidence-Based Interventions for Frontline Health Care Workers-A Literature Review
    Delassalle, Nancy
    Cavaciuti, Mary
    [J]. DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 42 (02) : 53 - 62
  • [7] An overview of mixed methods research - revisited
    Doyle, Louise
    Brady, Anne-Marie
    Byrne, Gobnait
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2016, 21 (08) : 623 - 635
  • [8] A Systematic Literature Review on e-Mental Health Solutions to Assist Health Care Workers During COVID-19
    Drissi, Nidal
    Ouhbi, Sofia
    Marques, Goncalo
    de la Torre Diez, Isabel
    Ghogho, Mounir
    Janati Idrissi, Mohammed Abdou
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2021, 27 (06) : 594 - 602
  • [9] Fitch K, 2001, The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual.
  • [10] Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review
    Jakob, Robert
    Harperink, Samira
    Rudolf, Aaron Maria
    Fleisch, Elgar
    Haug, Severin
    Mair, Jacqueline Louise
    Salamanca-Sanabria, Alicia
    Kowatsch, Tobias
    Jakob, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05)