Better together? Student's benefits of educational market integration*

被引:1
作者
Allende, Claudio [1 ]
Luksic, Juan Diego [2 ]
Navarrete, H. Nicolas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Inst Educ, Ctr Adv Res Educ, Santiago, Chile
[2] Govt Chile, Minist Housing & Urban Planning, Santiago, Chile
[3] City Univ London, Dept Econ, London, England
关键词
COLLEGE ADMISSIONS; SCHOOL; INSTITUTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103233
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Educational market integration have become a common practice in various countries, changing potentially student's application and enrollment behavior. We implement a difference-indifference estimation exploiting student's geographic exposure to market integration in Chile to understand student's gain and losses from this process. Using administrative data, we show that the market integration process has no effect on overall university enrollment but changes the enrollment composition: new platform institutions increased enrollment and old ones decreased. The reduction in application costs and the release of additional information, particularly historical cutoff data, seem to play a more significant role in shaping these dynamics than the congestion reduction. Heterogeneity analysis shows that low-income students enrollment increase, reflecting application barriers to decentralized admission institutions and implying gains in equity and efficiency of the system.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The Welfare Effects of Coordinated Assignment: Evidence from the New York City High School Match [J].
Abdulkadiroglu, Atila ;
Agarwal, Nikhil ;
Pathak, Parag A. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 107 (12) :3635-3689
[2]   Winners and Losers? The Effect of Gaining and Losing Access to Selective Colleges on Education and Labor Market Outcomest [J].
Black, Sandra E. ;
Denning, Jeffrey T. ;
Rothstein, Jesse .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 15 (01) :26-67
[3]   AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, MISMATCH, AND ECONOMIC MOBILITY AFTER CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 209 [J].
Bleemer, Zachary .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 137 (01) :115-160
[4]   Structural Estimation of a Model of School Choices: The Boston Mechanism versus Its Alternatives [J].
Calsamiglia, Caterina ;
Fu, Chao ;
Guell, Maia .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (02) :642-680
[5]   Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors [J].
Cameron, A. Colin ;
Gelbach, Jonah B. ;
Miller, Douglas L. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (03) :414-427
[6]   Medieval Universities, Legal Institutions, and the Commercial Revolution [J].
Cantoni, Davide ;
Yuchtman, Noam .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2014, 129 (02) :823-887
[7]  
Card D., 1995, Aspects of Labour Market Behaviour: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp, P201
[8]   Mother's education and the intergenerational transmission of human capital: Evidence from college openings [J].
Currie, J ;
Moretti, E .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (04) :1495-1532
[9]   Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences [J].
De Chaisemartin, C. ;
D'Haultfoeuille, X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2018, 85 (02) :999-1028
[10]   Too Far to Go On? Distance to School and University Participation [J].
Frenette, Marc .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2006, 14 (01) :31-58