The Effect of Multisensory Distraction on Working Memory: A Role for Task Relevance?

被引:1
|
作者
Turoman, Nora [1 ,2 ]
Vergauwe, Evie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, 40 Blvd Pont Arve, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
working memory; distraction; multisensory; task relevance; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; AUDITORY-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; SIMULTANEOUS STORAGE; OBJECT RECOGNITION; BRAIN-REGIONS;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0001323
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that working memory and selective attention are highly related. However, a key function of selective attention-ignoring distractors-is much less understood in the domain of working memory. In the attention domain, it is now clear that distractors' task relevance and stimulation of multiple senses at a time (i.e., being multisensory), affect how much such information can distract from the main task, and that load modulates these effects. Here, we examined the effects of the task relevance and multisensory nature of distractors on working memory performance under high and low memory load, aiming to clarify whether distracting information similarly affects selective attention performance and working memory performance. We proposed a multiexperiment research plan involving up to three consecutive experiments, based on an initial online study (Experiment 0) with fully task-irrelevant distractors. There, we found conclusive evidence against a difference in how unisensory and multisensory distractors affected working memory performance. The next study, Experiment 1, replicated these results. However, when distractors were made partly task relevant in the subsequent Experiment 2d, multisensory distractors disrupted working memory performance more than unisensory distractors on average. However, closer nonpreregistered inspection revealed that multisensory distractors were actually only more disruptive than auditory distractors, and similarly as disruptive as visual distractors. Thus, overall, there was no strong evidence for multisensory distractors being more disruptive to working memory performance than unisensory distractors. Taken together, these experiments constitute a novel and detailed investigation of the impact of distracting information on working memory performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1248
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multisensory working memory capture of attention
    Xu, Lei
    Cai, Biye
    Yue, Chunlin
    Wang, Aijun
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (07) : 2363 - 2373
  • [22] Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?
    Mahajan, Yatin
    Kim, Jeesun
    Davis, Chris
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [23] Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction
    Tavares, Tamara P.
    Logie, Kyle
    Mitchell, Derek G. V.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2016, 234 (10) : 2945 - 2956
  • [24] The Effect of a Verbal Concurrent Task on Visual Precision in Working Memory
    Berry, Ed D. J.
    Allen, Richard J.
    Waterman, Amanda H.
    Logie, Robert H.
    EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 66 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [25] The Effect of Spatial Consistence on Multisensory Integration in a Divided Attention Task
    Yang, Jingjing
    Chu, Jinlong
    Li, Xiujun
    Tong, Dan
    ISICDM 2018: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMAGE COMPUTING AND DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2018, : 133 - 137
  • [26] The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching
    Pettigrew, Corinne
    Martin, Randi C.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 69 (12) : 2431 - 2451
  • [27] The Effect of Task Interruption on Working Memory Performance
    Chen, Yue-Yuan
    Fang, Wei-Ning
    Bao, Hai-Feng
    Guo, Bei-Yuan
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024, 66 (04) : 1132 - 1151
  • [28] Role of aging and working memory in performance on a naturalistic visual search task
    Aziz, Jasmine R.
    Good, Samantha R.
    Klein, Raymond M.
    Eskes, Gail A.
    CORTEX, 2021, 136 : 28 - 40
  • [29] The influence of story context on a working memory span task
    Schroeder, Paul J.
    Copeland, David E.
    Bies-Hernandez, Nicole J.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03) : 488 - 500
  • [30] Working memory in simultaneous interpreters: Effects of task and age
    Signorelli, Teresa M.
    Haarmann, Henk J.
    Obler, Loraine K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2012, 16 (02) : 198 - 212