The Effect of Multisensory Distraction on Working Memory: A Role for Task Relevance?

被引:1
|
作者
Turoman, Nora [1 ,2 ]
Vergauwe, Evie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, 40 Blvd Pont Arve, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
working memory; distraction; multisensory; task relevance; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; AUDITORY-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; AUDIOVISUAL INTEGRATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERCEPTUAL LOAD; SIMULTANEOUS STORAGE; OBJECT RECOGNITION; BRAIN-REGIONS;
D O I
10.1037/xlm0001323
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that working memory and selective attention are highly related. However, a key function of selective attention-ignoring distractors-is much less understood in the domain of working memory. In the attention domain, it is now clear that distractors' task relevance and stimulation of multiple senses at a time (i.e., being multisensory), affect how much such information can distract from the main task, and that load modulates these effects. Here, we examined the effects of the task relevance and multisensory nature of distractors on working memory performance under high and low memory load, aiming to clarify whether distracting information similarly affects selective attention performance and working memory performance. We proposed a multiexperiment research plan involving up to three consecutive experiments, based on an initial online study (Experiment 0) with fully task-irrelevant distractors. There, we found conclusive evidence against a difference in how unisensory and multisensory distractors affected working memory performance. The next study, Experiment 1, replicated these results. However, when distractors were made partly task relevant in the subsequent Experiment 2d, multisensory distractors disrupted working memory performance more than unisensory distractors on average. However, closer nonpreregistered inspection revealed that multisensory distractors were actually only more disruptive than auditory distractors, and similarly as disruptive as visual distractors. Thus, overall, there was no strong evidence for multisensory distractors being more disruptive to working memory performance than unisensory distractors. Taken together, these experiments constitute a novel and detailed investigation of the impact of distracting information on working memory performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1248
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multisensory perspective of working memory
    Quak, Michel
    London, Raquel Elea
    Talsma, Durk
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [2] The Sources of Dual-task Costs in Multisensory Working Memory Tasks
    Katus, Tobias
    Eimer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 31 (02) : 175 - 185
  • [3] Executive and Perceptual Distraction in Visual Working Memory
    Allen, Richard J.
    Baddeley, Alan D.
    Hitch, Graham J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 43 (09) : 1677 - 1693
  • [4] The vulnerability of working memory to distraction is rhythmic
    Woestmann, Malte
    Lui, Troby Ka-Yan
    Friese, Kai-Hendrik
    Kreitewolf, Jens
    Naujokat, Malte
    Obleser, Jonas
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 146
  • [5] The role of working memory capacity in auditory distraction: A review
    Sorqvist, Patrik
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2010, 12 (49) : 217 - 224
  • [6] Effect of Auditory Distraction on Working Memory, Attention Switching, and Listening Comprehension
    Nagaraj, Naveen K.
    AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (02) : 227 - 243
  • [7] Cognitive Control of Auditory Distraction: Impact of Task Difficulty, Foreknowledge, and Working Memory Capacity Supports Duplex-Mechanism Account
    Hughes, Robert W.
    Hurlstone, Mark J.
    Marsh, John E.
    Vachon, Francois
    Jones, Dylan M.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2013, 39 (02) : 539 - 553
  • [8] A test of interference versus decay in working memory: Varying distraction within lists in a complex span task
    Farrell, Simon
    Oberauer, Klaus
    Greaves, Martin
    Pasiecznik, Kazimir
    Lewandowsky, Stephan
    Jarrold, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 90 : 66 - 87
  • [9] Distraction biases working memory for faces
    Mallett, Remington
    Mummaneni, Anurima
    Lewis-Peacock, Jarrod A.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (02) : 350 - 356
  • [10] Distraction from pain and executive functioning: An experimental investigation of the role of inhibition, task switching and working memory
    Verhoeven, Katrien
    Van Damme, Stefaan
    Eccleston, Christopher
    Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M. L.
    Legrain, Valery
    Crombez, Geert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2011, 15 (08) : 866 - 873