Exploring factors influencing implementation of interprofessional education in undergraduate healthcare programmes: a multiple-case study

被引:1
作者
Aladwani, Mohra [1 ]
Hindi, Ali [2 ]
Wakefield, Ann [3 ]
Willis, Sarah [2 ]
Hall, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Taif Univ, Pharm Coll, Clin Pharm Dept, Taif, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Ctr Pharm Workforce Studies, Sch Hlth Sci,Div Pharm & Optometry, Manchester, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Nursing Midwifery & Social Work, Manchester, England
关键词
Interprofessional education; IPE implementation; factors influencing IPE; undergraduates;
D O I
10.1080/13561820.2023.2289508
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interprofessional education (IPE) can help prepare future graduates to work collaboratively in healthcare teams. Using a multiple-case study approach, we explored IPE across four United Kingdom (UK) Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to identify factors affecting IPE implementation and outcomes. For each site, educators involved with IPE were surveyed and interviewed to explore IPE implementation. To examine outcomes, students took part in focus groups and accreditation reports published by professional regulators were explored. A total of five IPE courses were surveyed, six IPE leads were interviewed, three focus groups were conducted with students, and sixteen reports were reviewed. Regulators' standards mandating IPE and directives by the Deans were the main triggers for IPE initiation. In sites where the regulator's standards were perceived by educators as non-mandating IPE, some staff were less inclined to engage with IPE initiation, which adversely affected IPE planning and delivery. Students from such sites were less satisfied with their IPE experiences and uncertain about the purpose of IPE. Senior management (i.e. Dean) commitment and support is needed to establish IPE initiatives across the institution and cultivate a collaborative culture. The presence of a collaborative culture was associated with positive feedback from regulators and students regarding IPE.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 282
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Mafinejad M., 2014, RES DEV MED ED, V3, P67
[22]   Dyadic Interviews as a Tool for Qualitative Evaluation [J].
Morgan, David L. ;
Eliot, Susan ;
Lowe, Robert A. ;
Gorman, Paul .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2016, 37 (01) :109-117
[23]  
Najjar G., 2020, Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice, V21, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.XJEP.2020.100371
[24]  
NHS, 2019, The NHS Long Term Plan [Internet]
[25]   Implementing interprofessional learning curriculum: how problems might also be answers [J].
O'Keefe, Maree ;
Ward, Helena .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
[26]   Positive and Negative Factors That Influence Health Care Faculty Intent to Engage in Interprofessional Education (IPE) [J].
Olenick, Maria ;
Flowers, Monica ;
Munecas, Teresa ;
Maltseva, Tatayana .
HEALTHCARE, 2019, 7 (01)
[27]   A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39 [J].
Reeves, Scott ;
Fletcher, Simon ;
Barr, Hugh ;
Birch, Ivan ;
Boet, Sylvain ;
Davies, Nigel ;
McFadyen, Angus ;
Rivera, Josette ;
Kitto, Simon .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2016, 38 (07) :656-668
[28]  
Shrader S., 2022, Journal of Interprofessional Education Practice, V26, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.XJEP.2021.100484
[29]   A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance [J].
Skivington, Kathryn ;
Matthews, Lynsay ;
Simpson, Sharon Anne ;
Craig, Peter ;
Baird, Janis ;
Blazeby, Jane M. ;
Boyd, Kathleen Anne ;
Craig, Neil ;
French, David P. ;
McIntosh, Emma ;
Petticrew, Mark ;
Rycroft-Malone, Jo ;
White, Martin ;
Moore, Laurence .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 374
[30]  
Spencer L., 2003, Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers, P199