ArrayNet: A Combined Seismic Phase Classification and Back-Azimuth Regression Neural Network for Array Processing Pipelines

被引:3
作者
Koehler, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Myklebust, Erik B. [1 ]
机构
[1] NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway
[2] UiT Arctic Univ Norway AK, Tromso, Norway
关键词
SLOWNESS; LOCATION; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1785/0120230056
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Array processing is an integral part of automatic seismic event detection pipelines for measuring apparent velocity and backazimuth of seismic arrivals. Both quantities are usually measured under the plane-wave assumption, and are essential to classify the phase type and to determine the direction toward the event epicenter. However, structural inhomogeneities can lead to deviations from the plane-wave model, which must be taken into account for phase classification and back-azimuth estimation. We suggest a combined classification and regression neural network, which we call ArrayNet, to determine the phase type and back -azimuth directly from the arrival-time differences between all combinations of stations of a given seismic array without assuming a plane-wave model. ArrayNet is trained using regional P-and S -wave arrivals of over 30,000 seismic events from reviewed regional bulletins in northern Europe from the past three decades. ArrayNet models are generated and trained for each of the ARCES, FINES, and SPITS seismic arrays. We observe excellent per-formance for the seismic phase classification (up to 99% accuracy), and the derived back -azimuth residuals are significantly improved in comparison with traditional array processing results using the plane-wave assumption. The SPITS array in Svalbard exhibits particular issues when it comes to array processing in the form of high apparent seismic velocities and a multitude of frost quake signals inside the array, and we show how our new approach better handles these obstacles. Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of ArrayNet on 20 months of continuous phase detections from the ARCES array and investigate the results for a selection of regional seismic events of interest. Our results demonstrate that automatic event detection at seismic arrays can be further enhanced using a machine learning approach that takes advantage of the unique array data recorded at these stations.
引用
收藏
页码:2345 / 2362
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory/USGS, 2014, IRIS DMC
  • [2] Use of GSETT-3 gamma data in the Slowness-Azimuth Calibration of IMS primary arrays at regional distances
    Ben Horin, Y
    Koch, K
    Bartal, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2004, 8 (01) : 129 - 142
  • [3] Preface to the Focus Section on Machine Learning in Seismology
    Bergen, Karianne J.
    Chen, Ting
    Li, Zefeng
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 90 (02) : 477 - 480
  • [4] Berrar Daniel, 2019, Encyclopedia Bioinform Comput Biol, P546, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20351-8, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20351-8]
  • [5] BERTEUSSEN KA, 1976, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V66, P719
  • [6] ObsPy: A Python']Python Toolbox for Seismology
    Beyreuther, Moritz
    Barsch, Robert
    Krischer, Lion
    Megies, Tobias
    Behr, Yannik
    Wassermann, Joachim
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (03) : 530 - 533
  • [7] AN AUTOMATIC SEISMIC EVENT PROCESSING FOR DETECTION AND LOCATION - THE PMCC METHOD
    CANSI, Y
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1995, 22 (09) : 1021 - 1024
  • [8] HIGH-RESOLUTION FREQUENCY-WAVENUMBER SPECTRUM ANALYSIS
    CAPON, J
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1969, 57 (08) : 1408 - &
  • [9] Chollet F, 2015, KERAS GITHUB REPOSIT
  • [10] Douglas A., 2002, Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, P357