Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
作者
Bejrananda, Tanan [1 ]
Takahara, Kiyoshi [2 ]
Sowanthip, Dutsadee [3 ]
Motonaga, Tomonari [2 ]
Yagi, Kota [2 ]
Nakamura, Wataru [2 ]
Saruta, Masanobu [2 ]
Nukaya, Takuhisa [2 ]
Takenaka, Masashi [2 ]
Zennami, Kenji [2 ]
Ichino, Manabu [2 ]
Sasaki, Hitomi [2 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Shiroki, Ryoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Div Urol, Thai Red Cross Soc,Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CONTINENCE; JAPANESE; PROPOSAL; RATES; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels>0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications <= 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p<0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p<0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p<0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p<0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Age-stratified potency outcomes of bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Arezki, Adel
    Sadri, Iman
    Zakaria, Ahmed S.
    Couture, Felix
    Nguyen, David-Dan
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Elterman, Dean S.
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 11424 - 11431
  • [42] Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience
    Afferi, Luca
    Moschini, Marco
    Baumeister, Philipp
    Zamboni, Stefania
    Cornelius, Julian
    Ineichen, Gallus
    Mattei, Agostino
    Mordasini, Livio
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 389 - 397
  • [43] Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution
    Bonet, Xavier
    Ogaya-Pinies, Gabriel
    Woodlief, Tracey
    Hernandez-Cardona, Eduardo
    Ganapathi, Hariharan
    Rogers, Travis
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Vigues, Francesc
    Patel, Vipul
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) : 837 - 844
  • [44] Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Kadomoto, Suguru
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Yaegashi, Hiroshi
    Iijima, Masashi
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (08) : 773 - 780
  • [45] Lymphocele after extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity score-matching study
    Lee, Joo Yong
    Diaz, Richilda Red
    Cho, Kang Su
    Yu, Ho Song
    Chung, Jae Seung
    Ham, Won Sik
    Choi, Young Deuk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 1169 - 1176
  • [46] Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes
    Shin, Tae Young
    Lee, Yong Seong
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (03) : 314 - 321
  • [47] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes
    Fonseca, Jorge
    Moraes-Fontes, Maria Francisca
    Rebola, Jorge
    Lucio, Rui
    Almeida, Miguel
    Muresan, Ciprian
    Palmas, Artur
    Gaivao, Ana
    Matos, Celso
    Santos, Tiago
    Dias, Daniela
    Sousa, Ines
    Oliveira, Francisco
    Ribeiro, Ricardo
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    Fraga, Avelino
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (03) : 1133 - 1142
  • [48] Does transition from standard to Retzius-sparing technique in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy affect the functional and oncological outcomes?
    Anil, Hakan
    Karamik, Kaan
    Yildiz, Ali
    Savas, Murat
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 93 (04) : 399 - 403
  • [49] The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts
    Haga, Nobuhiro
    Hata, Junya
    Matsuoka, Kanako
    Koguchi, Tomoyuki
    Akaihata, Hidenori
    Kataoka, Masao
    Sato, Yuichi
    Ogawa, Soichiro
    Ishibashi, Kei
    Kojima, Yoshiyuki
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2018, 37 (01) : 322 - 330
  • [50] Development and validation of nomograms for predicting pentafecta outcomes before and after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study
    Bejrananda, Tanan
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Sowanthip, Dutsadee
    Motonaga, Tomonari
    Yagi, Kota
    Nakamura, Wataru
    Saruta, Masanobu
    Nukaya, Takuhisa
    Takenaka, Masashi
    Zennami, Kenji
    Ichino, Manabu
    Sasaki, Hitomi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):