Comparing pentafecta outcomes between nerve sparing and non nerve sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a propensity score-matched study

被引:3
|
作者
Bejrananda, Tanan [1 ]
Takahara, Kiyoshi [2 ]
Sowanthip, Dutsadee [3 ]
Motonaga, Tomonari [2 ]
Yagi, Kota [2 ]
Nakamura, Wataru [2 ]
Saruta, Masanobu [2 ]
Nukaya, Takuhisa [2 ]
Takenaka, Masashi [2 ]
Zennami, Kenji [2 ]
Ichino, Manabu [2 ]
Sasaki, Hitomi [2 ]
Sumitomo, Makoto [2 ]
Shiroki, Ryoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Div Urol, Dept Surg, Fac Med, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, King Chulalongkorn Mem Hosp, Div Urol, Thai Red Cross Soc,Fac Med, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; CONTINENCE; JAPANESE; PROPOSAL; RATES; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-43092-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Pentafecta (continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no complications) is an important outcome of prostatectomy. Our objective was to assess the pentafecta achievement between nerve-spring and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a large single-center cohort. The study included 1674 patients treated with RARP between August 2009 and November 2022 to assess the clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of RARP for pentafecta achievement, and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed between the nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing to test the validity of the results. Pentafecta definition included continence, which was defined as the use of zero pads; potency, which was defined as the ability to achieve and maintain satisfactory erections or ones firm enough for sexual activity and sexual intercourse. The biochemical recurrence rate was defined as two consecutive PSA levels>0.2 ng/mL after RARP; 90-day Clavien-Dindo complications <= 3a; and a negative surgical pathologic margin. The median follow-up period was 61.3 months (IQR 6-159 months). A multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that pentafecta achievement was significantly associated with nerve-sparing (NS) approach (1188 patients) (OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.51-6.9), p<0.001), unilateral nerve preservation (983 patients) (OR 3.83; 95% CI 2.31-6.37, p<0.001) and bilateral nerve preservation (205 patients) (OR 7.43; 95% CI 4.14-13.36, p<0.001). After propensity matching, pentafecta achievement rates in the NS (476 patients) and non-NS (476 patients) groups were 72 (15.1%) and 19 (4%), respectively. (p<0.001). NS in RARP offers a superior advantage in pentafecta achievement compared with non-NS RARP. This validation study provides the pentafecta outcome after RARP associated with nerve-sparing in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chitosan membranes applied on the prostatic neurovascular bundles after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a phase II study
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Fiori, Cristian
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Geuna, Stefano
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (03) : 472 - 478
  • [22] Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Wesley W. Choi
    Marcos P. Freire
    Jane R. Soukup
    Lei Yin
    Stuart R. Lipsitz
    Fernando Carvas
    Stephen B. Williams
    Jim C. Hu
    World Journal of Urology, 2011, 29 : 21 - 27
  • [23] 'Igloo' technique for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - maximum nerve sparing for early recovery of continence and sexual function
    Fankhauser, Christian D.
    Malkmus, Christian
    Aschwanden, Fabian
    Baumeister, Philipp
    Mattei, Agostino
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (02) : 307 - 311
  • [24] Quality of life after brachytherapy or bilateral nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a prospective cohort
    Blanchard, Pierre
    Davis, John W.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Kim, Jeri
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Pugh, Thomas J.
    Pisters, Louis L.
    Ward, John F.
    Choi, Seungtaek
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Hoffman, Karen
    Navai, Neema
    Achim, Mary
    McGuire, Sean E.
    Matin, Surena F.
    Quynh Nguyen
    Mahmood, Usama
    Graber, William J.
    Chen, Hsiang-Chun
    Wang, Xuemei
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (04) : 540 - 548
  • [25] Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria
    Rechtman, Michael
    Forbes, Andrew
    Millar, Jeremy L.
    Evans, Melanie
    Dodds, Lachlan
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Evans, Sue M.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] Saline-assisted fascial exposure (SAFE) technique to improve nerve-sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Gupta, Raghav
    Joshi, Himanshu
    Parekh, Sneha
    Schlussel, Kacie
    Berryhill, Roy
    Kaufmann, Basil
    Wagaskar, Vinayak
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Menon, Mani
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (04) : 451 - 459
  • [27] Sexual experiences after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy
    Martinez-Bordajandi, Alvaro
    Fernandez-Sola, Cayetano
    Puga-Mendoza, Ana Patricia
    Lopez-Entrambasaguas, Olga Maria
    Lucas-Matheu, Manuel
    Granero-Molina, Jose
    Fernandez Medina, Isabel Maria
    Hernandez-Padilla, Jose Manuel
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 33
  • [28] Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy with a Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Approach: Early Oncological and Functional Results
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Salomon, Laurent
    Paul, Alexandre
    Gillion, Norman
    De Laet, Kevin
    Vordos, Dimitri
    Hoznek, Andras
    Abbou, Clement-Claude
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 577 - 582
  • [29] Longitudinal evaluation of the frequency of sexual intercourse and sexual activity in patients after nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Inoue, Shogo
    Hayashi, Testutaro
    Teishima, Jun
    Matsubara, Akio
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (05) : 560 - 566
  • [30] Baseline factors and surgical procedures affecting changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the impact of nerve-sparing
    Soda, Takeshi
    Otsuka, Hikari
    Koike, Shuhei
    Okada, Takuya
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (03) : 989 - 997