Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:1
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trade-offs/Synergies in Land-use Function Changes in Central China from 2000 to 2015
    Qing Li
    Yong Zhou
    Tao Xu
    Li Wang
    Qian Zuo
    Jingyi Liu
    Xueping Su
    Nan He
    Zhengxiang Wu
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2021, 31 : 711 - 726
  • [42] Spatial characteristics and trade-offs of ecosystem services in arid central asia
    Ding, Qian
    Wang, Li
    Fu, Meichen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 161
  • [43] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [44] Unravelling the spatiotemporal trade-offs and synergies among hydrological ecosystem services in a large floodplain lake
    Li, Bing
    Yang, Guishan
    Wan, Rongrong
    Hamilton, David P.
    Wang, Xueran
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 172
  • [45] Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services Provided by Different Rural Landscape
    Bartolini, Fabio
    Vergamini, Daniele
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [46] Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Xin Cheng
    Sylvie Van Damme
    Luyuan Li
    Pieter Uyttenhove
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 1693 - 1705
  • [47] Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergies
    Ament, Judith M.
    Moore, Christine A.
    Herbst, Marna
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (04): : 440 - 450
  • [48] Response of trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services and land use change in the Karst area
    Huiqing Han
    Changying Yin
    Chaoqiong Zhang
    Hongjuan Gao
    Yumei Bai
    Tropical Ecology, 2019, 60 : 230 - 237
  • [49] Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Qin-Mang River Basin
    Zhao, Jiwei
    Wang, Luyao
    Jia, Dong
    Wang, Yaowen
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [50] Cultural ecosystem services in an urban park: understanding bundles, trade-offs, and synergies
    Cheng, Xin
    Van Damme, Sylvie
    Li, Luyuan
    Uyttenhove, Pieter
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1693 - 1705