Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:1
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protecting biodiversity to support ecosystem services: An analysis of trade-offs and synergies in southwestern China
    Lin, Ziyan
    Wu, Tong
    Xiao, Yi
    Rao, Enming
    Shi, Xuewei
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2022, 59 (09) : 2440 - 2451
  • [32] County zoning and optimization paths for trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Northeast China
    Wang, Shihao
    Shi, Huading
    Xu, Xinliang
    Huang, Lin
    Gu, Qingbao
    Liu, Hanbing
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 164
  • [33] Exploring Trade-Offs/Synergies and Drivers of Ecosystem Services in the Dongting Lake Area, China
    Huang, Ying
    Chen, Xinsheng
    Zhu, Lianlian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (04)
  • [34] Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services on the Tibetan Plateau
    Yuan, Zhengrong
    Liang, Yuling
    Zhao, Hui
    Wei, Da
    Wang, Xiaodan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 158
  • [35] Economic and ecological trade-offs of coastal reclamation in the Hangzhou Bay, China
    Qiu, Lefeng
    Zhang, Min
    Zhou, Bibing
    Cui, Yuanzheng
    Yu, Zhoulu
    Liu, Tao
    Wu, Shaohua
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 125
  • [36] Exploring the complex trade-offs and synergies of global ecosystem services
    Wang, Jinnan
    Wu, Wenjun
    Yang, Meng
    Gao, Yueming
    Shao, Jiacheng
    Yang, Weishan
    Ma, Guoxia
    Yu, Fang
    Yao, Nan
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ECOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21
  • [37] How Do Ecological Restoration Projects Affect Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services?
    Ji, Yuhui
    Xie, Miaomiao
    Liu, Yunxuan
    Zhu, Renfen
    Tang, Zhuoyun
    Hu, Rongwei
    LAND, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [38] Assessing levels, trade-offs and synergies of landscape services in the Iranian province of Qazvin: towards sustainable landscapes
    Asef Darvishi
    Maryam Yousefi
    Naghmeh Mobarghaee Dinan
    Per Angelstam
    Landscape Ecology, 2022, 37 : 305 - 327
  • [39] Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes
    Tobias Plieninger
    Mario Torralba
    Tibor Hartel
    Nora Fagerholm
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1565 - 1581
  • [40] Spatial characteristics and trade-offs of ecosystem services in arid central asia
    Ding, Qian
    Wang, Li
    Fu, Meichen
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 161