Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:1
|
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [22] Economic and ecological trade-offs of agricultural specialization at different spatial scales
    Klasen, Stephan
    Meyer, Katrin M.
    Dislich, Claudia
    Euler, Michael
    Faust, Heiko
    Gatto, Marcel
    Hettig, Elisabeth
    Melati, Dian N.
    Jaya, Nengah Surati
    Otten, Fenna
    Perez-Cruzado, Cesar
    Steinebach, Stefanie
    Tarigan, Suria
    Wiegand, Kerstin
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 122 : 111 - 120
  • [23] Trade-offs and synergies of farmland ecosystem services in Loess Plateau: A case study of Longdong Region, Northwest China
    Lan Y.
    Sun T.
    Li W.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39 (12): : 236 - 244
  • [24] Variations in the Value and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services on Topographic Gradients in Qinghai Province, China
    Ma, Xiaofan
    Zhang, Haifeng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [25] Trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services in Yutian County along the Keriya River Basin, Northwest China
    Zubaida, Muyibul
    JOURNAL OF ARID LAND, 2024, 16 (07) : 943 - 962
  • [26] Precipitation dominants synergies and trade-offs among ecosystem services across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
    Chen, Junhe
    Wang, Yafeng
    Sun, Jian
    Liang, Eryuan
    Shen, Miaogen
    Yang, Bin
    Jia, Xiaohua
    Zhang, Jianxiang
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 32
  • [27] Plant functional traits shape multiple ecosystem services, their trade-offs and synergies in grasslands
    Hanisch, Mario
    Schweiger, Oliver
    Cord, Anna F.
    Volk, Martin
    Knapp, Sonja
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (08) : 1535 - 1550
  • [28] Mapping ecosystem services in Colombia: Analysis of synergies, trade-offs and bundles in environmental management
    Burgos-Ayala, Aracely
    Jimenez-Aceituno, Amanda
    Meacham, Megan
    Rozas-Vasquez, Daniel
    Garcia, Maria Mancilla
    Rocha, Juan
    Rincon-Ruiz, Alexander
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 66
  • [29] Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015
    Xu, Xibao
    Yang, Guishan
    Tan, Yan
    Liu, Jingping
    Hu, Huizhi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 634 : 1601 - 1614
  • [30] Optimization of the Ecological Network Structure Based on Scenario Simulation and Trade-Offs/Synergies among Ecosystem Services in Nanping
    Wang, Zixuan
    Xiao, Ling
    Yan, Haiming
    Qi, Yuanjing
    Jiang, Qun'ou
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (20)