Economic-ecological services and their trade-offs or synergies of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi, central China

被引:1
|
作者
Xiang, Hui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Arts & Sci, Coll Geog & Tourism, Changde 415000, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Inst Green Low Carbon Dev, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Agricultural landscapes; Xiangxi; Trade-offs; Synergies; MAPPING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; MOUNTAIN REGIONS; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19145
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The scarcity of agricultural ecosystem services (ESs) caused by land use changes has become increasingly prominent, and the negative effects of agricultural production on ecosystems have been a constant concern. In this work, the geographic information system mapping method, the agricultural product supply (AS) model and InVEST model were applied to assess the economic and ecological services of agricultural landscapes. The interlinkages among them in Xiangxi were explored, a mountainous area in central China. The major conclusions drawn were as follows.1) From 2000 to 2020, the economic services (ESs1) of agricultural landscapes in Xiangxi increased by 96.6667%, and those of grain yield per ha (X1), cash crop output value per ha (X2), forestry output value per ha (X3), meat production per capita in rural areas (X4), and fishery output per ha (X5) were 39.0405%, 510.8462%, 297.6807%, 64.5947%, and 194.0348%, respectively. The spatial distribution of X1, X2, X3, X4, and X5 changed considerably, and the major influencing factors were human elements. 2) Ecological services (ESs2) increased by 5.13%, and those of carbon storage (CS, X6), water conservation (WC, X7), and N content in water (X8) were 1.0897%, 13.5808%, and -0.7406%, respectively. The distribution of X6, X7, and X8 was nearly unchanged and primarily influenced by natural factors 3) The relationship between ESs1 and ESs2 was not ideal. The dominant relationships between AS and CS were trade-offs, those between AS and WC were synergies, and those between AS and water purification were trade-offs. 4) The following suggestions are proposed: promote afforestation and vegetation protection policies, implement the best agricultural policies, increase investment in water conservation projects, adjust agricultural scale, and control the usage of agricultural chemicals. For the surrounding areas of more developed regions, strict environmental measures and agricultural policies are necessary. The methods used in this study are novel and can provide methodological references for similar studies. Moreover, it may offer useful suggestions for agricultural resource management and contribute to ecological civilization construction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Qiao, Xuning
    Gu, Yangyang
    Zou, Changxin
    Wang, Lei
    Luo, Juhua
    Huang, Xianfeng
    CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [2] Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China
    Li, Boyan
    Wang, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 837 - 846
  • [3] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [4] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    QIAO Xuning
    GU Yangyang
    ZOU Changxin
    WANG Lei
    LUO Juhua
    HUANG Xianfeng
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 (01) : 86 - 99
  • [5] Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China
    Xuning Qiao
    Yangyang Gu
    Changxin Zou
    Lei Wang
    Juhua Luo
    Xianfeng Huang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2018, 28 : 86 - 99
  • [6] Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies
    Kirchner, Mathias
    Schmidt, Johannes
    Kindermann, Georg
    Kulmer, Veronika
    Mitter, Herrnine
    Prettenthaler, Franz
    Ruedisser, Johannes
    Schauppenlehner, Thomas
    Schoenhart, Martin
    Strauss, Franziska
    Tappeiner, Ulrike
    Tasser, Erich
    Schmid, Erwin
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 109 : 161 - 174
  • [7] Limited Economic-Ecological Trade-Offs in a Shifting Agricultural Landscape: A Case Study From Kern County, California
    Wartenberg, Ariani C.
    Moanga, Diana
    Potts, Matthew D.
    Butsic, Van
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [8] Analyzing Farmers' Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and PES Schemes within Agricultural Landscapes in Mengyin County, China: Transforming Trade-Offs into Synergies
    Chen, Yajuan
    Zhang, Qian
    Liu, Wenping
    Yu, Zhenrong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (08)
  • [9] Bundling ecosystem services at a high resolution in the UK: trade-offs and synergies in urban landscapes
    James D. Karimi
    Ron Corstanje
    Jim A. Harris
    Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36 : 1817 - 1835
  • [10] Bundling ecosystem services at a high resolution in the UK: trade-offs and synergies in urban landscapes
    Karimi, James D.
    Corstanje, Ron
    Harris, Jim A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (06) : 1817 - 1835