Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Yu, Fei [1 ]
Tang, Yang-Wei [2 ]
Wang, Ju [2 ]
Lin, Zhi-Cheng [3 ]
Liu, Yu-Bin [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Polytech Normal Univ, Coll Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Huaiji Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Zhaoqing, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Orthoped Ctr, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, 253 Gongye Middle Ave, Guangzhou 510280, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Intramedullary nail; Dynamic hip screw; Hip fractures; meta-analysis; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL; UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GAMMA-NAIL; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; PERITROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; LOCKING NAIL; ANTIROTATION; FEMUR; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06715-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHip fractures are still unsolved problems nowadays. We evaluated the functional outcomes and complications in the treatment of hip fractures (AO/OTA31A1-A3) to find potential difference and risk between intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS).MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library up to 19 June 2023 and retrieved any studies comparing IMN and DHS in treatment of Hip fractures. The main outcomes and complications were extracted from the included studies. The fixed-effect model was selected to pool the data for homogeneous studies (I-2 < 50%). Otherwise, the random effects model was selected (heterogeneity, I-2 > 50%). The analysis of sensitivity and subgroup was performed to explore the homogeneous studies among studies. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results30 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant difference of in the items of blood loss, screening time, femoral neck shortening, non-union, and femoral fractures (p < 0.05). Significant difference was found in the parameter of open reduction of fracture after sensitive analysis (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the parameter of Mobility Score at the last follow-up after sensitive analysis (p & GE; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters of open reduction of fracture, required blood transfusion, mean surgical time, hospital stays, time to healing, mean Harris Hip Score, infection, cut out, poor reduction, breakage of implant, failure of fixation, reoperation, and systemic complications of chest infection, decubital ulcer, urinary tract infection and persistent pain in the hip (p & GE; 0.05).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis revealed that hip fractures treated with IMN have merits with lower rate of blood loss, femoral neck shortening and non-union; shortcoming of increased risk of femoral fractures. It is suggested that special attention should be paid to the risk of femoral fracture when intramedullary nail was inserted in the intraoperative.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [11] FIXATION OF INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR - A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF THE GAMMA-NAIL AND THE DYNAMIC HIP SCREW
    BRIDLE, SH
    PATEL, AD
    BIRCHER, M
    CALVERT, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1991, 73 (02): : 330 - 334
  • [12] COMPARISON OF DYNAMIC HIP SCREW AND GAMMA-NAIL - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL
    BUTT, MS
    KRIKLER, SJ
    NAFIE, S
    ALI, MS
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1995, 26 (09): : 615 - 618
  • [13] Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients
    Chua, Ivan Tjun Huat
    Rajamoney, Ganesan Naidu
    Kwek, Ernest Beng Kee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (03) : 308 - 312
  • [14] Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures - A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients
    Hardy, DCR
    Descamps, PY
    Krallis, P
    Fabeck, L
    Smets, P
    Bertens, CL
    Delince, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 80A (05) : 618 - 630
  • [15] Intramedullary hip screw versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly
    Harrington, P
    Nihal, A
    Singhania, AK
    Howell, FR
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 (01): : 23 - 28
  • [16] An experimental study of the failure modes of the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw under static loading: a cadaveric study
    Haynes, RC
    Poll, RG
    Miles, AW
    Weston, RB
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1997, 19 (05) : 446 - 453
  • [17] Higgins J. P., 2019, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions
  • [18] Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: A randomized prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the Ambi hip screw
    Hoffman, CW
    Lynskey, TG
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (03): : 151 - 155
  • [19] Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of PFNA, PFLCP, and DHS in Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture
    Huang, Shou-Guo
    Chen, Bo
    Zhang, Yong
    Nie, Feng-Feng
    Ju, Liang
    Li, Ming
    Zhang, Ying-Hua
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 24 (06) : e659 - e666
  • [20] No advantages of Gamma nail over sliding hip screw in the management of peritrochanteric hip fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    Zhao, Chang-Qing
    Dai, Li-Yang
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 30 (07) : 493 - 497