Does intramedullary nail have advantages over dynamic hip screw for the treatment of AO/OTA31A1-A3? A meta-analysis

被引:2
作者
Yu, Fei [1 ]
Tang, Yang-Wei [2 ]
Wang, Ju [2 ]
Lin, Zhi-Cheng [3 ]
Liu, Yu-Bin [3 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Polytech Normal Univ, Coll Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Huaiji Peoples Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Zhaoqing, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Zhujiang Hosp, Orthoped Ctr, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, 253 Gongye Middle Ave, Guangzhou 510280, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Intramedullary nail; Dynamic hip screw; Hip fractures; meta-analysis; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL; UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GAMMA-NAIL; TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; PERITROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; LOCKING NAIL; ANTIROTATION; FEMUR; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06715-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHip fractures are still unsolved problems nowadays. We evaluated the functional outcomes and complications in the treatment of hip fractures (AO/OTA31A1-A3) to find potential difference and risk between intramedullary nail (IMN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS).MethodWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library up to 19 June 2023 and retrieved any studies comparing IMN and DHS in treatment of Hip fractures. The main outcomes and complications were extracted from the included studies. The fixed-effect model was selected to pool the data for homogeneous studies (I-2 < 50%). Otherwise, the random effects model was selected (heterogeneity, I-2 > 50%). The analysis of sensitivity and subgroup was performed to explore the homogeneous studies among studies. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results30 RCT studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were significant difference of in the items of blood loss, screening time, femoral neck shortening, non-union, and femoral fractures (p < 0.05). Significant difference was found in the parameter of open reduction of fracture after sensitive analysis (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the parameter of Mobility Score at the last follow-up after sensitive analysis (p & GE; 0.05). There was no significant difference in the parameters of open reduction of fracture, required blood transfusion, mean surgical time, hospital stays, time to healing, mean Harris Hip Score, infection, cut out, poor reduction, breakage of implant, failure of fixation, reoperation, and systemic complications of chest infection, decubital ulcer, urinary tract infection and persistent pain in the hip (p & GE; 0.05).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis revealed that hip fractures treated with IMN have merits with lower rate of blood loss, femoral neck shortening and non-union; shortcoming of increased risk of femoral fractures. It is suggested that special attention should be paid to the risk of femoral fracture when intramedullary nail was inserted in the intraoperative.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur
    Adams, CI
    Robinson, CM
    Court-Brown, CM
    McQueen, MM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2001, 15 (06) : 394 - 400
  • [2] Comparison of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of AO A2 and A3 fractures of femur
    Adeel, Khaqan
    Nadeem, Rana Dilawaiz
    Akhtar, Muhammad
    Sah, Ranjit Kumar
    Mohy-Ud-Din, Iftikhar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 70 (05) : 815 - 819
  • [3] Ahrengart L, 2002, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P209
  • [4] Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur
    Aktselis, Ioannis
    Kokoroghiannis, Constantine
    Fragkomichalos, Evaggelos
    Koundis, Georgios
    Deligeorgis, Anastasios
    Daskalakis, Emmanouil
    Vlamis, John
    Papaioannou, Nikolaos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (01) : 155 - 161
  • [5] GAMMA-NAIL VS COMPRESSION SCREW FOR TROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES - 15 REOPERATIONS IN A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF 378 PATIENTS
    AUNE, AK
    EKELAND, A
    ODEGAARD, B
    GROGAARD, B
    ALHO, A
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 65 (02): : 127 - 130
  • [6] Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fractures
    Avakian, Zorik
    Shiraev, Timothy
    Lam, Lawrence
    Hope, Nigel
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (1-2) : 56 - 59
  • [7] A Comparison of the Long Gamma Nail with the Sliding Hip Screw for the Treatment of AO/OTA 31-A2 Fractures of the Proximal Part of the Femur A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Barton, Tristan M.
    Gleeson, Robert
    Topliss, Claire
    Greenwood, Rosemary
    Harries, William J.
    Chesser, Timothy J. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (04) : 792 - 798
  • [8] Bastard Claire, 2019, Rev Prat, V69, P1124
  • [9] Bellabarba C, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P30
  • [10] Femoral Medialization, Fixation Failures, and Functional Outcome in Trochanteric Hip Fractures Treated With Either a Sliding Hip Screw or an Intramedullary Nail From Within a Randomized Trial
    Bretherton, Christopher P.
    Parker, Martyn J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2016, 30 (12) : 642 - 646