Alveolar ridge preservation of damaged or periodontally compromised extraction sockets with bovine- and porcine-derived block bone substitutes: A retrospective case-control study

被引:3
作者
Lee, Jae-Hong [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Kim, Yeon-Tae [3 ]
Jeong, Seong-Nyum [3 ]
机构
[1] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Periodontol, Jeonju, South Korea
[2] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Inst Oral Biosci, Jeonju, South Korea
[3] Wonkwang Univ, Daejeon Dent Hosp, Inst Wonkwang Dent Res, Dept Periodontol,Coll Dent, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Jeonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Periodontol, Coll Dent, 567 Baekje daero, Jeonju 54896, South Korea
关键词
alveolar bone grafting; bone regeneration; bone substitute; dental implants; wound healing; CONNECTIVE-TISSUE GRAFT; BIO-OSS(R) COLLAGEN; CLINICAL-TRIAL; AUGMENTATION; MEMBRANE; IMPLANTS; OUTCOMES; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13246
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
PurposeAlveolar ridge preservation (ARP) was introduced to minimize postextraction alveolar bone loss and extraction socket remodeling; however, current knowledge of the ARP procedure for nonintact extraction sockets is still limited and inconclusive. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference between using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBM-C) and deproteinized porcine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DPBM-C) when performing ARP procedures in damaged or periodontally compromised extraction sockets based on clinical, radiographic, and profilometric outcomes. MethodsIn total, 108 extraction sockets were grafted with 67 DBBM-C and 41 DPBM-C. Changes in radiographic (horizontal width and vertical height) and profilometric outcomes were measured after the ARP procedure and before the implant surgery. Postoperative discomfort (including the severity and duration of pain and swelling), early wound healing outcomes (including spontaneous bleeding and persistent swelling), implant stability, and treatment modalities for implant placement were also assessed. ResultsRadiographically, the DBBM-C group decreased by -1.70 & PLUSMN; 2.26 mm (-21.50%) and - 1.39 & PLUSMN; 1.85 mm (-30.47%) horizontally and vertically, and the corresponding DPBM-C group decreased by -1.66 & PLUSMN; 1.80 mm (-20.82%) and -1.44 & PLUSMN; 1.97 mm (-27.89%) horizontally and vertically at an average of 5.6 months. There were no serious or adverse complications in any of the cases, and none of the measured parameters differed significantly between the groups. ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, ARP with DBBM-C and DPBM-C showed similar clinical, radiographic, and profilometric outcomes in nonintact extraction sockets.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1043
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Is there clinical evidence to support alveolar ridge preservation over extraction alone? A review of recent literature and case reports of late graft failure [J].
Adams, Robert J. .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2022, 233 (06) :469-474
[2]  
Ahn JJ, 2008, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V23, P1133
[3]   Histological comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using enamel matrix derivatives versus Bio-Oss Collagen: a pilot study [J].
Alkan, E. A. ;
Parlar, A. ;
Yildirim, B. ;
Senguven, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (12) :1522-1528
[4]   Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss® collagen: A 6-month study in the dog [J].
Araujo, Mauricio G. ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (05) :433-440
[5]   Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development [J].
Atieh, M. A. ;
Alsabeeha, N. H. M. ;
Payne, A. G. T. ;
Ali, S. ;
Faggion, C. M. J. ;
Esposito, M. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (04)
[6]   Alveolar ridge preservation in extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Atieh, Momen A. ;
Alnaqbi, Maitha ;
Abdunabi, Farida ;
Lin, Lifeng ;
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (09) :869-885
[7]   Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development [J].
Atieh, Momen A. ;
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. ;
Payne, Alan G. T. ;
Duncan, Warwick ;
Faggion, Clovis M. ;
Esposito, Marco .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (05)
[8]   Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Avila-Ortiz, Gustavo ;
Chambrone, Leandro ;
Vignoletti, Fabio .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2019, 46 :195-223
[9]   Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hard Tissue Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation [J].
Bassir, Seyed Hossein ;
Alhareky, Muhanad ;
Wangsrimongkol, Buddhathida ;
Jia, Yinan ;
Karimbux, Nadeem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (05) :979-+
[10]   Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients [J].
Bazrafshan, Nima ;
Darby, Ivan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (07) :768-773