Enhancing Tool Wear Prediction Accuracy Using Walsh-Hadamard Transform, DCGAN and Dragonfly Algorithm-Based Feature Selection

被引:27
作者
Shah, Milind [1 ]
Borade, Himanshu [2 ]
Sanghavi, Vedant [3 ]
Purohit, Anshuman [2 ]
Wankhede, Vishal [1 ]
Vakharia, Vinay [1 ]
机构
[1] PDEU, Sch Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Gandhinagar 382426, Gujarat, India
[2] Medi Caps Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Indore 453331, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] NYU, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, New York, NY 11201 USA
关键词
tool wear; generative adversarial network; Walsh-Hadamard transform; Dragonfly; Harris hawk; feature selection; FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/s23083833
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Tool wear is an important concern in the manufacturing sector that leads to quality loss, lower productivity, and increased downtime. In recent years, there has been a rise in the popularity of implementing TCM systems using various signal processing methods and machine learning algorithms. In the present paper, the authors propose a TCM system that incorporates the Walsh-Hadamard transform for signal processing, DCGAN aims to circumvent the issue of the availability of limited experimental dataset, and the exploration of three machine learning models: support vector regression, gradient boosting regression, and recurrent neural network for tool wear prediction. The mean absolute error, mean square error and root mean square error are used to assess the prediction errors from three machine learning models. To identify these relevant features, three metaheuristic optimization feature selection algorithms, Dragonfly, Harris hawk, and Genetic algorithms, were explored, and prediction results were compared. The results show that the feature selected through Dragonfly algorithms exhibited the least MSE (0.03), RMSE (0.17), and MAE (0.14) with a recurrent neural network model. By identifying the tool wear patterns and predicting when maintenance is required, the proposed methodology could help manufacturing companies save money on repairs and replacements, as well as reduce overall production costs by minimizing downtime.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Agogino A., 2007, MILLING DATA SET
  • [2] Arora H., 2019, P 2019 12 INT C CONT, DOI [10.1109/ic3.2019.8844913, DOI 10.1109/IC3.2019.8844913]
  • [3] WALSH TRANSFORMS
    BEER, T
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1981, 49 (05) : 466 - 472
  • [4] Deep Spectral-Spatial Feature Extraction Based on DCGAN for Hyperspectral Image Retrieval
    Chen, Lu
    Zhang, Jing
    Liang, Xi
    Li, Jiafeng
    Zhuo, Li
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 15TH INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, 15TH INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, 3RD INTL CONF ON BIG DATA INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING AND CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS(DASC/PICOM/DATACOM/CYBERSCI, 2017, : 752 - 759
  • [5] CORTES C, 1995, MACH LEARN, V20, P273, DOI 10.1023/A:1022627411411
  • [6] Generative Adversarial Networks An overview
    Creswell, Antonia
    White, Tom
    Dumoulin, Vincent
    Arulkumaran, Kai
    Sengupta, Biswa
    Bharath, Anil A.
    [J]. IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2018, 35 (01) : 53 - 65
  • [7] Unsupervised Damage Detection for Offshore Jacket Wind Turbine Foundations Based on an Autoencoder Neural Network
    del Cisne Feijoo, Maria
    Zambrano, Yovana
    Vidal, Yolanda
    Tutiven, Christian
    [J]. SENSORS, 2021, 21 (10)
  • [8] Detection of tool condition from the turned surface images using an accurate grey level co-occurrence technique
    Dutta, S.
    Datta, A.
    Das Chakladar, N.
    Pal, S. K.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    Sen, R.
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 36 (03): : 458 - 466
  • [9] Tool Condition Monitoring in Turning by Applying Machine Vision
    Dutta, Samik
    Pal, Surjya K.
    Sen, Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (05):
  • [10] Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2001, 29 (05) : 1189 - 1232