Market reaction to firms' investments in CSR projects

被引:0
作者
Cherkasova, Victoria [1 ]
Fedorova, Elena [2 ]
Stepnov, Igor [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Sch Finance, Moscow, Russia
[2] Financial Univ Govt Russian Federat, Moscow, Russia
[3] MGIMO, Dept Assets Management, Moscow, Russia
来源
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE | 2023年 / 28卷 / 55期
关键词
Corporate social responsibility; Excess stock return; ESG score; Additive value; Market valuation; CSR performance; G11; G12; G17; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; INITIATIVES; COMPANIES; RETURNS; IMPACT; MATTER; STOCKS; RISK; PAY;
D O I
10.1108/JEFAS-08-2021-0150
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to determine the impact of corporate investments in corporate social responsibility (CSR), measured by the environmental, social and government (ESG) rating, on the market valuation of a firm's stocks and to explain the regional differences in the degree of this influence.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study uses linear and non-linear panel regression models for a panel sample of 951 firms listed in Asia, North America and Europe operating in innovative industries.FindingsThe CSR score was found to be significant in terms of stock excess return on the regional level. However, this finding cannot be extrapolated to the global scale. ESG rating is priced by the European and North American markets negatively, while in the Asian market, it is positive. This penalty (negative influence) is greater than the reward for one point increase in ESG rating.Practical implicationsThe results of this empirical study could be used by firms' managers to adjust strategies aimed at stock value growth and by investors to select an investment strategy to maximize return.Originality/valueThe impact of investments in CSR on stock excess return over a defined benchmark is assessed. The study reveals regional differences in the impact of CSR investment using a sample of Asian, European and North American firms. The authors apply a more advanced lagged CSR performance (d.ESG) assessment based on the methodology of Zhang and Rajagopalan (2010).
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 59
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance
    Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan
    Aboul-Dahab, Sameh
    Agag, Gomaa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2022, 64
  • [2] Akisik O., 2014, J Manag Control, V25, P259, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10551-012-1227-4, 10.1007/s00187-014-0198-2, DOI 10.1007/S00187-014-0198-2]
  • [3] Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data
    Aouadi A.
    Marsat S.
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) : 1027 - 1047
  • [4] Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data
    Auer, Benjamin R.
    Schuhmacher, Frank
    [J]. QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2016, 59 : 51 - 62
  • [5] Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders
    Barnea, Amir
    Rubin, Amir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [6] How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency?
    Biddle, Gary C.
    Hilary, Gilles
    Verdi, Rodrigo S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2009, 48 (2-3) : 112 - 131
  • [7] Bouteska Ahmed, 2020, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, V25, P451
  • [8] Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional ownership
    Buchanan, Bonnie
    Cao, Cathy Xuying
    Chen, Chongyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2018, 52 : 73 - 95
  • [9] CSR and financial performance: complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours
    Cavaco, Sandra
    Crifo, Patricia
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (27) : 3323 - 3338
  • [10] Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation
    Chang, Xin
    Fu, Kangkang
    Low, Angie
    Zhang, Wenrui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 115 (01) : 168 - 188