Spatiotemporal landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning models: A case study from district Hattian Bala, NW Himalaya, Pakistan

被引:26
|
作者
Khaliq, Ahmad Hammad [1 ]
Basharat, Muhammad [1 ]
Riaz, Malik Talha [1 ]
Riaz, Muhammad Tayyib [1 ]
Wani, Saad [1 ]
Al-Ansari, Nadhir [2 ]
Le, Long Ba [3 ]
Linh, Nguyen Thi Thuy [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Inst Geol, Muzaffarabad 13100, Pakistan
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Environm & Nat Resources Engn, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[3] Ind Univ Ho Chi Minh City, Inst Environm Sci Engn & Management, 12 Nguyen Bao, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Thu Dau Mot Univ, Inst Appl Technol, Thu Dau Mot, Binh Duong Prov, Vietnam
关键词
Hattian Bala; Landslide susceptibility; Logistic regression; Machine learning; Random forest; 2005 KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FUZZY MULTICRITERIA; INFORMATION VALUE; FREQUENCY RATIO; DECISION TREE; RANDOM FOREST; HAZARD; SELECTION; MULTIVARIATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.asej.2022.101907
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Himalayan region, a rugged mountain zone is among the most susceptible zones to the landslide hazard due to its terrain, geography, and active tectonics. Machine learning (ML) techniques are most advanced and precise methods to develop landslide susceptibility model (LSM). The current study was designed to analyze and assess the landslide susceptibility using ML approaches for District Hattian Bala, NW Himalayas, Pakistan. The historical satellite imageries are used to generate spatiotemporal landslide inventories of year 2005, 2007 and 2012. A spatial database was created pertaining to topographic, environmental, geologic, and anthropogenic factors including slope, aspect, elevation, curvature, plane curvature, profile curvature, topographic wetness index (TWI), lithology, distance to faults, distance to streams, distance to roads, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and land use/ land cover (LULC). These LCFs were selected to analyze periodic landslide susceptibility in the region. The experimental design utilized 349, 393, and 735 landslide inventory of 2005, 2007, and 2012 respectively. Two ML models, i.e., Random Forest (RF) and Logistic Regression (LR) were applied to assess landslide susceptibility determine by thirteen landslide causative factors (LCFs). The spatiotemporal landslide inventory was partitioned into training (70%) and testing (30%) landslides for respective years to check the prediction accuracies of selected ML models. Comparative analysis of different LSMs was performed by the Receiver Operator Curves - Area Under Curves (ROC-AUC). The resultant accuracy, MAE, RMSE, Kappa, Precision, Recall, F1 indicated that RF outperformed the LR model. The study aims to minimize losses to lives and potential economic damage linked with recurrent slope instabilities in the region. It is anticipated that use of ML algorithms would support concerned authorities and organizations to effectively plan and manage landslide hazard in the region.(c) 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study of different machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Conghua District, Guangzhou, China
    Zhang, Ao
    Zhao, Xin-wen
    Zhao, Xing-yuezi
    Zheng, Xiao-zhan
    Zeng, Min
    Huang, Xuan
    Wu, Pan
    Jiang, Tuo
    Wang, Shi-chang
    He, Jun
    Li, Yi-yong
    CHINA GEOLOGY, 2024, 7 (01) : 104 - 115
  • [22] Comparative study of different machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment:A case study of Conghua District,Guangzhou,China
    Ao Zhang
    Xin-wen Zhao
    Xing-yuezi Zhao
    Xiao-zhan Zheng
    Min Zeng
    Xuan Huang
    Pan Wu
    Tuo Jiang
    Shi-chang Wang
    Jun He
    Yi-yong Li
    China Geology, 2024, 7 (01) : 104 - 115
  • [23] Improved landslide susceptibility mapping using unsupervised and supervised collaborative machine learning models
    Su, Chenxu
    Wang, Bijiao
    Lv, Yunhong
    Zhang, Mingpeng
    Peng, Dalei
    Bate, Bate
    Zhang, Shuai
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2023, 17 (02) : 387 - 405
  • [24] Investigating landslide data balancing for susceptibility mapping using generative and machine learning models
    Jiang, Yuhang
    Wang, Wei
    Zou, Lifang
    Cao, Yajun
    Xie, Wei-Chau
    LANDSLIDES, 2025, 22 (01) : 189 - 204
  • [25] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using RBFN-Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Nguyen, Duc-Dam
    Tiep, Nguyen Viet
    Bui, Quynh-Anh Thi
    Van Le, Hiep
    Prakash, Indra
    Costache, Romulus
    Pandey, Manish
    Pham, Binh Thai
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2025, 142 (01): : 467 - 500
  • [26] Comparing Convolutional Neural Network and Machine Learning Models in Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in Wenchuan County
    Zhang, Sikui
    Bai, Lin
    Li, Yuanwei
    Li, Weile
    Xie, Mingli
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [27] Landslide susceptibility mapping using ensemble machine learning methods: a case study in Lombardy, Northern Italy
    Xu, Qiongjie
    Yordanov, Vasil
    Amici, Lorenzo
    Brovelli, Maria Antonia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [28] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study in Colorado Front Range, USA
    Pei, Te
    Qiu, Tong
    GEO-CONGRESS 2023: GEOTECHNICS OF NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 338 : 521 - 530
  • [29] Landslide susceptibility mapping using XGBoost machine learning method
    Badola, Shubham
    Mishra, Varun Narayan
    Parkash, Surya
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE INTELLIGENCE FOR GEOANALYTICS AND REMOTE SENSING, MIGARS, 2023, : 148 - 151
  • [30] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Machine Learning: A Literature Survey
    Ado, Moziihrii
    Amitab, Khwairakpam
    Maji, Arnab Kumar
    Jasinska, Elzbieta
    Gono, Radomir
    Leonowicz, Zbigniew
    Jasinski, Michal
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)