Development of Design Principles for AR Authoring Tools for Education Based on Teacher's Perspectives

被引:1
作者
Silva, Manoela [1 ]
Roberto, Rafael [1 ]
Radu, Iulian [2 ]
Cavalcante, Patricia [3 ]
Schneider, Bertrand [2 ]
Teichrieb, Veronica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Informat, Voxar Labs, BR-50740560 Recife, Brazil
[2] Harvard Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Ctr Educ, EDUMATEC, BR-50670901 Recife, Brazil
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2024年 / 17卷
关键词
Authoring systems; Education; Distributed Bragg reflectors; Programming profession; Collaboration; Guidelines; Visualization; Augmented reality (AR); authoring systems; design-based research (DBR); design principles; education; AUGMENTED REALITY; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1109/TLT.2023.3327592
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Augmented reality (AR) can have a positive impact on students' motivation and cognitive performance in varied age levels and different contexts. However, its use is still far from widespread in education. One of the reasons mentioned in the literature is the lack of AR authoring tools that consider the educational perspective, which means they do not usually take pedagogic aspects into account. This work investigates what characteristics are important for AR authoring in education in the form of design principles. We aimed to identify how teachers would like to create AR experiences based on their pedagogic needs through design-based research (DBR) with the participation of an interdisciplinary team to investigate and propose design principles for AR educational authoring. We followed the four steps of DBR in two cycles. We worked with multiple teachers, mostly English teachers, to understand their educational needs when authoring AR experiences. Based on that, we defined and prototyped an application focused on language learning for children and teenagers, which we evaluated in two test rounds. As a result, we proposed 11 design principles divided into three aspects: infrastructure, AR, and pedagogy. These principles were evaluated positively by teachers. To help us understand the options currently available for teachers, we analyzed the existing AR authoring tools that do not require programming to see if they meet the proposed design principles. Most of them lack important features for teachers, specifically pedagogical ones. Finally, we provided an in-depth discussion of the context and application of those principles.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 690
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Almgren J., 2005, Proceedings of SIGRAD 2005, P19
  • [2] Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
    Amershi, Saleema
    Weld, Dan
    Vorvoreanu, Mihaela
    Fourney, Adam
    Nushi, Besmira
    Collisson, Penny
    Suh, Jina
    Iqbal, Shamsi
    Bennett, Paul N.
    Inkpen, Kori
    Teevan, Jaime
    Kikin-Gil, Ruth
    Horvitz, Eric
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [3] Amiel T, 2008, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V11, P29
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Future Classroom Maturity Model Reference Guide
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2023, Augmented Reality
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, Start Designing and Prototyping
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2014, PBS Kids
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, Augmented Reality Design Guidelines
  • [9] Bacca J, 2014, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V17, P133
  • [10] Behnam Sana, 2022, The usability of augmented reality