The Impact of Varying Femoral Head Length on Hip External Rotation During Posterior-approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
作者
Jang, Seong J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jones, Christopher [1 ]
Shanaghan, Kate [1 ]
Mayman, David J. [1 ]
Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez [1 ]
Sculco, Peter Keyes [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; External rotation; Femoral head length; Hip stability; Range of motion; Posterior approach; RANGE; MOTION; OFFSET; STABILITY; DISLOCATION; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2022.101072
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prior investigations of total hip arthroplasty (THA) have studied the effects of prosthetic femoral head size and stem offset on hip range of motion (ROM), impingement risk, and overall hip stability to optimize the return to activities of daily living. However, the relationship between femoral head length and hip ROM, specifically external rotation (ER), has not been evaluated. The aim of our study was to intraoperatively assess how femoral head length affects hip ROM during a posterior approach THA.Methods: Thirty-two patients undergoing a primary elective THA through a posterior approach were prospectively included. After final femoral stem insertion, femoral head trials were performed using the targeted head length, followed by the shorter (-3.0 to -3.5 mm) and longer (+3.0 to +4.0 mm) head length configurations. At each length, hip ER was measured using an intraoperative goniometer from an imageless navigation system. ER values across the three head lengths were compared using a repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired t-tests.Results: Varying femoral head lengths demonstrated a statically significant and reproducible effect on intraoperative ER range (analysis of variance; P < .001) in each patient. An increased femoral head length (mean 3.4 mm) significantly decreased (P < .001) ER range by 10.8 +/- 3.3 degrees while a shortened femoral head length (mean 3.5 mm) significantly increased (P < .001) the ER ROM by 6.0 +/- 3.8 degrees.Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the sensitivity of hip ROM to incremental changes in femoral head length. As ER is important for activities of daily living, inadvertent lengthening should be avoided.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AMSTUTZ HC, 1975, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P124
[2]   The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint [J].
Bartz, RL ;
Noble, PC ;
Kadakia, NR ;
Tullos, HS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (09) :1300-1307
[3]   Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes - An in vitro study [J].
Burroughs, BR ;
Hallstrom, B ;
Golladay, GJ ;
Hoeffel, D ;
Harris, WH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) :11-19
[4]   Large diameter femoral heads IS BIGGER ALWAYS BETTER? [J].
Cooper, H. J. ;
Della Valle, C. J. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B :23-26
[5]  
Cross Michael B, 2012, HSS J, V8, P270, DOI 10.1007/s11420-012-9287-7
[6]   The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty [J].
Davis, Kenneth E. ;
Ritter, Merrill A. ;
Berend, Michael E. ;
Meding, John B. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (465) :180-184
[7]   Evolution of disability in adults with hip arthroplasty: A national longitudinal study [J].
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Nizard, Remy ;
Poiraudeau, Serge ;
Roy, Carine ;
Ravaud, Jean-Francois ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2007, 57 (03) :364-371
[8]   Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion [J].
Girard, J. ;
Krantz, N. ;
Bocquet, D. ;
Wavreille, G. ;
Migaud, H. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (02) :165-169
[9]  
Grosso Paul, 2016, Open Orthop J, V10, P490