Biodiversity conservation threatened by global mining wastes

被引:8
|
作者
Aska, Bora [1 ,2 ]
Franks, Daniel M. [2 ]
Stringer, Martin [3 ,4 ]
Sonter, Laura J. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Environm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sustainable Minerals Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Sustainable Minerals Inst Brisbane, WH Bryan Min & Geol Res Ctr, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Imperial Coll London, Sustainable Gas Inst, London, England
[5] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
MINE TAILINGS; DAM; BRAZIL; AREAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41893-023-01251-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mine tailings-the residue remaining after mineral processing-represent a serious risk to the natural environment, and the failure of tailing storage facilities has caused some of the most serious environmental disasters in history. However, the potential biodiversity impacts globally due to tailings are mostly unknown. Here we assess the spatial coincidence between 1,721 disclosed tailings storage facilities and currently protected areas (PAs) and other conservation priorities (Key Biodiversity Areas and remaining intact ecosystems). Nine percent of storage facilities are located within PAs, half of which were established after the PA was designated. Another 20% of storage facilities are within 5 km of a PA, indicating even larger risks posed by upstream facility failures. Despite international commitments to mitigating biodiversity loss, tailings storage facilities continue to be established within PAs, with an upward trend in the proportion established within already-existing PAs. Given our findings, it is unsurprising that biodiversity factors are rarely included when assessing and categorizing the risks posed by new and existing tailings storage facilities. Greater transparency and a holistic consequence-based approach, supported by data, monitoring and new technologies are needed to drive reform at local, national and regional levels. Facilities that store the waste and tailings of mining operations pose a salient threat to biodiversity. Despite international consensus to mitigate mining impacts on local ecosystems, globally, nearly 10% of facilities are located within protected areas and another 20% can be found within 5 km of their boundaries.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 30
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global Priorities for Marine Biodiversity Conservation
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    Turner, Will R.
    Troeng, Sebastian
    Wallace, Bryan P.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Kaschner, Kristin
    Lascelles, Ben G.
    Carpenter, Kent E.
    Mittermeier, Russell A.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [2] Global Biodiversity Conservation and the Alleviation of Poverty
    Turner, Will R.
    Brandon, Katrina
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Gascon, Claude
    Gibbs, Holly K.
    Lawrence, Keith S.
    Mittermeier, Russell A.
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    BIOSCIENCE, 2012, 62 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [3] Mining code changes undermine biodiversity conservation in Brazil
    Villen-Perez, Sara
    Mendes, Poliana
    Nobrega, Caroline
    Cortes, Lara Gomes
    De Marco Junior, Paulo
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 45 (01) : 96 - 99
  • [4] Global assessment of marine biodiversity potentially threatened by offshore hydrocarbon activities
    Venegas-Li, Ruben
    Levin, Noam
    Morales-Barquero, Lucia
    Kaschner, Kristin
    Garilao, Cristina
    Kark, Salit
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (06) : 2009 - 2020
  • [5] The conundrum of river sand mining and biodiversity conservation in Kerala, India
    Ashok, Lekshmi
    Varghese, George Kuttiparichel
    Thampi, Santosh Gopalakrishnan
    EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 2025, 23
  • [6] Identifying priority sites for the conservation of freshwater fish biodiversity in a Mediterranean basin with a high degree of threatened endemics
    Hermoso, V.
    Linke, S.
    Prenda, J.
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2009, 623 (01) : 127 - 140
  • [7] Protecting Important Sites for Biodiversity Contributes to Meeting Global Conservation Targets
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Scharlemann, Joern P. W.
    Evans, Mike I.
    Quader, Suhel
    Arico, Salvatore
    Arinaitwe, Julius
    Balman, Mark
    Bennun, Leon A.
    Bertzky, Bastian
    Besancon, Charles
    Boucher, Timothy M.
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Burfield, Ian J.
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Chan, Simba
    Clay, Rob P.
    Crosby, Mike J.
    Davidson, Nicholas C.
    De Silva, Naamal
    Devenish, Christian
    Dutson, Guy C. L.
    Fernandez, David F. Dia Z.
    Fishpool, Lincoln D. C.
    Fitzgerald, Claire
    Foster, Matt
    Heath, Melanie F.
    Hockings, Marc
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Knox, David
    Larsen, Frank W.
    Lamoreux, John F.
    Loucks, Colby
    May, Ian
    Millett, James
    Molloy, Dominic
    Morling, Paul
    Parr, Mike
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    Seddon, Nathalie
    Skolnik, Benjamin
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Upgren, Amy
    Woodley, Stephen
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (03):
  • [8] Biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: A role for systematic conservation planning
    Fonseca, Carlos Roberto
    Venticinque, Eduardo Martins
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2018, 16 (02) : 61 - 67
  • [9] Is the Spanish Population Pro-Conservation or Pro-Utilitarian towards Threatened Flora? Social Analysis on the Willingness to Protect Biodiversity
    Algarra, Jose A.
    Ramos-Lorente, Maria M.
    Carinanos, Paloma
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [10] Protected and Threatened Components of Fish Biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea
    Mouillot, David
    Albouy, Camille
    Guilhaumon, Francois
    Lasram, Frida Ben Rais
    Coll, Marta
    Devictor, Vincent
    Meynard, Christine N.
    Pauly, Daniel
    Tomasini, Jean Antoine
    Troussellier, Marc
    Velez, Laure
    Watson, Reg
    Douzery, Emmanuel J. P.
    Mouquet, Nicolas
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (12) : 1044 - 1050