Effectiveness of gamification and selection of appropriate teaching methods of creativity: Students' perspectives

被引:11
作者
Lee, Kuo-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Gen Educ, Ctr Liberal Arts, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Effective teaching; Analytical hierarchy process; Mandala thinking; Enhance learning; Teaching strategies; Student self -assessment; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; DECISION; THINKING; IMPACT; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20420
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Complex creativity and multiple learning objectives often require combining several teaching methods, and gamification may be an effective teaching strategy for enhancing learning. However, few studies have examined the combined effects of implementing gamification and multiple teaching methods in a course from students' perspectives. Therefore, this study implemented gamification and six teaching methods of enhancing college students' creativity in university creativity and innovation course in November and December 2021 and aimed to examine the effects on their creativity, collaboration, and communication skills and used the Analytical Hierarchy Process to identify more effective teaching methods corresponding to the learning objectives from students' perspectives. The results showed that students perceive that gamification could stimulate their motivation, attitudes, and interest in learning and enhance their creativity, collaboration, and communication skills. Furthermore, Mandala thinking was the most effective teaching method for the overall goal. In contrast, the most effective teaching methods for the creativity, collaboration, and communication skills learning objectives were the SCAMPER technique, balloon competition, and Mandala thinking, respectively. The results provide essential references for selecting effective teaching methods that meet the teaching objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 129 条
  • [1] STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review
    Aguilera, David
    Ortiz-Revilla, Jairo
    [J]. EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [2] Critical thinking in the university curriculum - the impact on engineering education
    Ahern, A.
    O'Connor, T.
    McRuairc, G.
    McNamara, M.
    O'Donnell, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [3] Gamification and discovery learning: Motivating and involving students in the learning process
    Aldalur, Inigo
    Perez, Alain
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [4] A Systematic Mapping of Negative Effects of Gamification in Education/Learning Systems
    Almeida, Clauvin
    Kalinowski, Marcos
    Feijo, Bruno
    [J]. 2021 47TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (SEAA 2021), 2021, : 17 - 24
  • [5] Effects of a gamified learning environment on students' achievement, motivations, and satisfaction
    Alsadoon, Elham
    Alkhawajah, Amirah
    Bin Suhaim, Ashwag
    [J]. HELIYON, 2022, 8 (08)
  • [6] Enhancing perceived digital literacy skills and creative self-concept through gamified learning environments: Insights from a longitudinal study
    Alt, Dorit
    Raichel, Nirit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 101
  • [7] Andang W., 2021, Int. J. Technol. Vocat. Educ. Train., P44, DOI [10.46643/ijtvet.v2i2.130, DOI 10.46643/IJTVET.V2I2.130]
  • [8] Capturing potential impact of challenge-based gamification on gamified quizzing in the classroom
    Anunpattana, Punyawee
    Khalid, Mohd Nor Akmal
    Iida, Hiroyuki
    Inchamnan, Wilawan
    [J]. HELIYON, 2021, 7 (12)
  • [9] Arora B., 2019, Chapter 6: How to Introduce and Integrate Creativity, P57, DOI [10.4337/9781788975087.00018, DOI 10.4337/9781788975087.00018]
  • [10] Barata G., 2013, P 1 INT C GAMIFICATI, DOI DOI 10.1145/2583008.2583023