Bone regeneration after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with different ratios of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral an in vivo experimental study

被引:1
|
作者
Starch-Jensen, Thomas [1 ,2 ,8 ,9 ]
Schou, Soren [3 ]
Terheyden, Hendrik [4 ]
Bruun, Niels Henrik [5 ]
Aludden, Hanna [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Med, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Specialtandlaegerne Seedorffs Straede, Private Practice Oral Surg, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Red Cross Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kassel, Germany
[5] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Unit Clin Biostat, Aalborg, Denmark
[6] NU Hosp Org, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Trollhattan, Sweden
[7] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Inst Surg Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Aalborg Univ, Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 18-22 Hobrovej, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
[9] Aalborg Univ, Fac Med, Dept Clin Med, 18-22 Hobrovej, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
alveolar ridge augmentation; bone substitutes; histology; maxillary sinus; sinus floor augmentation; BIO-OSS; EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL; GRAFTING MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; METAANALYSIS; SURGERY; TIME; AREA;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14186
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: Test the hypothesis of no difference in bone regeneration after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with different ratios of iliac or mandibular autogenous bone (AB) graft and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).Materials and Methods: Forty minipigs were randomly allocated to bilateral MSFA using: (A) 100% AB, (B) 75% AB and 25% DBBM, (C) 50% AB and 50% DBBM, (D) 25% AB and 75% DBBM, or (E) 100% DBBM. The animals were euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. Percentage of bone, non-mineralized tissue, and residual DBBM were estimated by histomorphometric analysis in a randomly selected region of interest and summarized as mean percentage with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Mean percentage of bone following MSFA with iliac or mandibular AB graft was: (A) 55.5% and 64.2%, (B) 60.3% and 61.6%, (C) 54.4% and 52.1%, (D) 51.8% and 53.1%, and (E) 47.6%, respectively. There was a significant trend toward a higher percentage of bone, with a higher ratio of AB within the graft (p < .01), regardless of the origin of AB graft (iliac or mandible).Conclusions: The hypothesis was rejected since percentage of bone was significantly increased with larger proportions of AB within the graft. Consequently, AB or a mixture of AB and diminutive quantities of DBBM seem to be the preferred graft for MSFA based solely on histomorphometric assessment. However, it should be emphasized that newly formed bone and residual AB graft particles could not be distinguished by the applied histologic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1416
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bone Regeneration of Macropore Octacalcium Phosphate-Coated Deproteinized Bovine Bone Materials in Sinus Augmentation: A Prospective Pilot Study
    Lee, Jee-Ho
    Kim, Jin-Hong
    Jeon, Ju-Hong
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [32] MAXILLARY SINUS AUGMENTATION WITH BOVINE BONE MINERAL (Bio-Oss"") AND THE MAXILLARY TUBEROSITY
    Han, Ki-Deok
    Chung, Il-Hyuk
    Lee, Eun-Kyung
    Suhl, Je-Duck
    Song, Seung-Il
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2007, 33 (04) : 391 - 396
  • [33] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Surgery with Autogenous Bone Grafts as Ceiling: A Pilot Study and Test of Principle
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Meijer, Henny J. A.
    Telleman, Gerdien
    Vissink, Arjan
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04) : 550 - 557
  • [34] Clinics Outcome of Implants Placed in Staged Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed with Autogenous Bone at Three Different Ratios: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-up Study
    Krennmair, Stefan
    Weinlaender, Michael
    Malek, Michael
    Forstner, Thomas
    Krennmair, Gerald
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (06) : 1351 - 1361
  • [35] Histomorphometrical analysis of bone formed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation by grafting with a combination of autogenous bone and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or hydroxyapatite
    Boëck-Neto, R
    Gabrielli, MFR
    Lia, RCC
    Marcantonio, E
    Shibli, JA
    Marcantonio, E
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 73 (03) : 266 - 270
  • [36] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implant after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with rhBMP-2/hydroxyapatite compared to deproteinized bovine bone
    Han, Jeong Joon
    Moon, Ji Eun
    Lee, Eun-Hyuk
    Yang, Hoon Joo
    Hwang, Soon Jung
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):
  • [37] A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone - Discussion
    Misch, CM
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (03) : 285 - 286
  • [38] AUGMENTATION OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS FLOOR WITH AUTOGENOUS BONE FOR THE PLACEMENT OF ENDOSSEOUS IMPLANTS - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT
    RAGHOEBAR, GM
    BROUWER, TJ
    REINTSEMA, H
    VANOORT, RP
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (11) : 1198 - 1203
  • [39] Randomized Clinical Trial of Maxillary Sinus Grafting using Deproteinized Porcine and Bovine Bone Mineral
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    Shin, Hyun-Ki
    Yun, Jeong-Ho
    Cho, Kyoo-Sung
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (01) : 140 - 150
  • [40] Sinus Floor Bone Failures in Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Case-Control Study
    Gonzalez Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez
    Pinheiro, Lucas Rodrigues
    Paraiso Cavalcanti, Marcelo Gusmao
    Arita, Emiko Saito
    Tamimi, Faleh
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (02) : 335 - 342