Comparison and evaluation of different deep learning models of synthetic CT generation from CBCT for nasopharynx cancer adaptive proton therapy

被引:5
|
作者
Pang, Bo [1 ]
Si, Hang [1 ]
Liu, Muyu [1 ]
Fu, Wensheng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zeng, Yiling [1 ]
Liu, Hongyuan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cao, Ting [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Quan, Hong [1 ,6 ]
Yang, Zhiyong [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Phys & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Key Lab Precis Radiat Oncol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Inst Radiat Oncol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Sch Phys & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; deep learning; proton therapy; synthetic CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SCATTER; ARTIFACTS;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16777
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning is used for patient setup in image-guided radiotherapy. However, its inaccurate CT numbers limit its applicability in dose calculation and treatment planning.PurposeThis study compares four deep learning methods for generating synthetic CT (sCT) to determine which method is more appropriate and offers potential for further clinical exploration in adaptive proton therapy for nasopharynx cancer.MethodsCBCTs and deformed planning CT (dCT) from 75 patients (60/5/10 for training, validation and testing) were used to compare cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN), Unet, Unet+cycleGAN and conditionalGenerative Adversarial Network (cGAN) for sCT generation. The sCT images generated by each method were evaluated against dCT images using mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), spatial non-uniformity (SNU) and radial averaging in the frequency domain. In addition, dosimetric accuracy was assessed through gamma analysis, differences in water equivalent thickness (WET), and dose-volume histogram metrics.ResultsThe cGAN model has demonstrated optimal performance in the four models across various indicators. In terms of image quality under global condition, the average MAE has been reduced to 16.39HU, SSIM has increased to 95.24%, and PSNR has increased to 28.98. Regarding dosimetric accuracy, the gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) has reached 99.02%, and the WET difference is only 1.28 mm. The D95 value of CTVs coverage and Dmax value of spinal cord, brainstem show no significant differences between dCT and sCT generated by cGAN model.ConclusionsThe cGAN model has been shown to be a more suitable approach for generating sCT using CBCT, considering its characteristics and concepts. The resulting sCT has the potential for application in adaptive proton therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6920 / 6930
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric Comparison and Selection Criteria of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Adaptive Re-Plan in T3-4 Nasopharynx Cancer Patients
    Ko, Mincheol
    Yang, Kyungmi
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Ju, Sang Gyu
    Oh, Dongryul
    Kim, Yeong-bi
    Kwon, Dong Yeol
    Park, Seyjoon
    Lee, Kisung
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (19)
  • [42] Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Computed Tomography (CT) from Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) by Incorporating Feature-Driven Loss into Intensity-Based Loss Functions in Deep Convolutional Neural Network
    Yoo, Sang Kyun
    Kim, Hojin
    Choi, Byoung Su
    Park, Inkyung
    Kim, Jin Sung
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [43] Deep Learning-Based Relative Stopping Power Mapping Generation with Cone-Beam CT in Proton Radiation Therapy
    Wang, Tonghe
    Harms, Joseph
    Lei, Yang
    Ghavidel, Beth
    Stokes, William
    Liu, Tian
    Curran, Walter J.
    McDonald, Mark
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 11312
  • [44] Lung cancer detection from thoracic CT scans using an ensemble of deep learning models
    Nandita Gautam
    Abhishek Basu
    Ram Sarkar
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 : 2459 - 2477
  • [45] Lung cancer detection from thoracic CT scans using an ensemble of deep learning models
    Gautam, Nandita
    Basu, Abhishek
    Sarkar, Ram
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2024, 36 (05) : 2459 - 2477
  • [46] MRI-based treatment planning for proton radiotherapy: dosimetric validation of a deep learning-based liver synthetic CT generation method
    Liu, Yingzi
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Yinan
    Wang, Tonghe
    Ren, Lei
    Lin, Liyong
    McDonald, Mark
    Curran, Walter J.
    Liu, Tian
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (14)
  • [47] Comparison of CBCT-based dose calculation methods in head and neck cancer radiotherapy: from Hounsfield unit to density calibration curve to deep learning
    Barateau, Anais
    De Crevoisier, Renaud
    Largent, Axel
    Mylona, Eugenia
    Perichon, Nicolas
    Castelli, Joel
    Chajon, Enrique
    Acosta, Oscar
    Simon, Antoine
    Nunes, Jean-Claude
    Lafond, Caroline
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (10) : 4683 - 4693
  • [48] Deep learning-based synthetic CT generation for MR-only radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients with 0.35T MRI linear accelerator
    Farjam, Reza
    Nagar, Himanshu
    Kathy Zhou, Xi
    Ouellette, David
    Chiara Formenti, Silvia
    DeWyngaert, J. Keith
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 22 (08): : 93 - 104
  • [49] Synthetic breath-hold CT generation from free-breathing CT: a novel deep learning approach to predict cardiac dose reduction in deep-inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy
    Koide, Yutaro
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Wakabayashi, Kohei
    Kitagawa, Tomoki
    Aoyama, Takahiro
    Miyauchi, Risei
    Tachibana, Hiroyuki
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (06) : 1065 - 1075
  • [50] Comparison of deep transfer learning models for classification of cervical cancer from pap smear images
    Kaur, Harmanpreet
    Sharma, Reecha
    Kaur, Jagroop
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):