Comparison and evaluation of different deep learning models of synthetic CT generation from CBCT for nasopharynx cancer adaptive proton therapy

被引:8
作者
Pang, Bo [1 ]
Si, Hang [1 ]
Liu, Muyu [1 ]
Fu, Wensheng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zeng, Yiling [1 ]
Liu, Hongyuan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cao, Ting [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Quan, Hong [1 ,6 ]
Yang, Zhiyong [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Phys & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Key Lab Precis Radiat Oncol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Inst Radiat Oncol, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Sch Phys & Technol, Dept Med Phys, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; deep learning; proton therapy; synthetic CT; RADIOTHERAPY; SCATTER; ARTIFACTS;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16777
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning is used for patient setup in image-guided radiotherapy. However, its inaccurate CT numbers limit its applicability in dose calculation and treatment planning.PurposeThis study compares four deep learning methods for generating synthetic CT (sCT) to determine which method is more appropriate and offers potential for further clinical exploration in adaptive proton therapy for nasopharynx cancer.MethodsCBCTs and deformed planning CT (dCT) from 75 patients (60/5/10 for training, validation and testing) were used to compare cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN), Unet, Unet+cycleGAN and conditionalGenerative Adversarial Network (cGAN) for sCT generation. The sCT images generated by each method were evaluated against dCT images using mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), spatial non-uniformity (SNU) and radial averaging in the frequency domain. In addition, dosimetric accuracy was assessed through gamma analysis, differences in water equivalent thickness (WET), and dose-volume histogram metrics.ResultsThe cGAN model has demonstrated optimal performance in the four models across various indicators. In terms of image quality under global condition, the average MAE has been reduced to 16.39HU, SSIM has increased to 95.24%, and PSNR has increased to 28.98. Regarding dosimetric accuracy, the gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) has reached 99.02%, and the WET difference is only 1.28 mm. The D95 value of CTVs coverage and Dmax value of spinal cord, brainstem show no significant differences between dCT and sCT generated by cGAN model.ConclusionsThe cGAN model has been shown to be a more suitable approach for generating sCT using CBCT, considering its characteristics and concepts. The resulting sCT has the potential for application in adaptive proton therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6920 / 6930
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Evaluation of Online/Offline Image Guidance/Adaptation Approaches for Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy [J].
Qin, An ;
Sun, Ying ;
Liang, Jian ;
Yan, Di .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 91 (05) :1026-1033
[22]   Adaptive Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer [J].
Qin, Yujiao ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Yoo, David S. ;
Kelsey, Chris R. ;
Yin, Fang-Fang ;
Cai, Jing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01) :209-215
[23]   Artefacts in CBCT: a review [J].
Schulze, R. ;
Heil, U. ;
Gross, D. ;
Bruellmann, D. D. ;
Dranischnikow, E. ;
Schwanecke, U. ;
Schoemer, E. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (05) :265-273
[24]   Dosimetric evaluation of cone-beam CT-based synthetic CTs in pediatric patients undergoing intensity-modulated proton therapy [J].
Sheikh, Khadija ;
Liu, Dezhi ;
Li, Heng ;
Acharya, Sahaja ;
Ladra, Matthew M. ;
Hrinivich, William T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (06)
[25]   Adaptive Radiotherapy for Anatomical to Changes [J].
Sonke, Jan-Jakob ;
Aznar, Marianne ;
Rasch, Coen .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) :245-257
[26]  
Stankiewicz Michal, 2019, Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol, V12, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.tipsro.2019.10.003
[27]   Clinical evaluation of synthetic computed tomography methods in adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer patients [J].
Taasti, Vicki Trier ;
Hattu, Djoya ;
Peeters, Stephanie ;
van der Salm, Anke ;
van der Loon, Judith ;
de Ruysscher, Dirk ;
Nilsson, Rasmus ;
Andersson, Sebastian ;
Engwall, Erik ;
Unipan, Mirko ;
Canters, Richard .
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 27
[28]   Deep learning-based 4D-synthetic CTs from sparse-view CBCTs for dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy [J].
Thummerer, Adrian ;
Oria, Carmen Seller ;
Zaffino, Paolo ;
Visser, Sabine ;
Meijers, Arturs ;
Marmitt, Gabriel Guterres ;
Wijsman, Robin ;
Seco, Joao ;
Langendijk, Johannes Albertus ;
Knopf, Antje Christin ;
Spadea, Maria Francesca ;
Both, Stefan .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (11) :6824-6839
[29]   Two-dimensional anti-scatter-grids for computed tomography detectors [J].
Vogtmeier, Gereon ;
Dorscheid, Ralf ;
Engel, Klaus Juergen ;
Luhta, Randy ;
Mattson, Rod ;
Harwood, Brian ;
Appleby, Mike ;
Randolph, Bill ;
Klinger, Jill .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913
[30]   Multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive optimization method to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers [J].
Yang, Zhiyong ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Wang, Xianliang ;
Zhu, Ronald ;
Gunn, Brandon ;
Frank, Steven J. ;
Chang, Yu ;
Li, Qin ;
Yang, Kunyu ;
Wu, Gang ;
Liao, Li ;
Li, Yupeng ;
Chen, Mei ;
Li, Heng .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 142 :124-132