The role of entrepreneurial alertness, digital platform capability, organisational agility and business model innovation on young innovative companies' performance

被引:6
作者
Troise, Ciro [1 ]
Jones, Paul [2 ]
Candelo, Elena [1 ]
Sorrentino, Mario [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Management, Turin, Italy
[2] Swansea Univ, Sch Management, Swansea, Wales
[3] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Econ, Capua, Italy
关键词
Young innovative companies; digital platforms; agility; business model; FIRM PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2023.2209223
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Studies on entrepreneurship trajectories of young innovative companies (YICs) are rare and discussion of the specific dynamics taking place within them has remained lacking. This research aims to explore these dynamics by focusing on the relationships between a set of factors and ultimately YIC's performance. Specifically, first we examined the effects of entrepreneurial alertness (EA) on three factors, namely digital platform capability (DPC), organisational agility (OA) and business model innovation (BMI); second, we focused on the effects of DPC on OA and then on those of OA on BMI; lastly, we explored the effects of DPC and BMI on YICs' performance, in terms of market performance (MP), product innovation (PROD) and process innovation (PROC). We adopted the PLS-SEM approach to test our hypotheses and the results support them, in fact, all with significant and positive effects. Our findings highlighted a set of capabilities and factors helping YICs to deal with uncertain and changing environments and to achieve a higher level of competitiveness and performance. YICs should develop crucial capabilities and create/nurture a culture focused on innovation and digital transformation. Main stakeholders (e.g. policymakers/governments) should at the same time stimulate cultural changes and introduce specific incentives and programmes to support YICs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Digital platform capability and organizational agility of emerging market manufacturing SMEs: The mediating role of intellectual capital and the moderating role of environmental dynamism
    Ahmed, Adeel
    Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain
    Golgeci, Ismail
    Arslan, Ahmad
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 177
  • [2] Amit R, 2012, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V53, P41
  • [3] Antecedents and consequences of business model innovation in the IT industry
    Bhatti, Sabeen Hussain
    Santoro, Gabriele
    Khan, Jabran
    Rizzato, Fabio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 123 : 389 - 400
  • [4] Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework
    Brand, Marco
    Tiberius, Victor
    Bican, Peter M.
    Brem, Alexander
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (01) : 157 - 187
  • [5] Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models
    Casadesus-Masanell, Ramon
    Zhu, Feng
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (04) : 464 - 482
  • [6] Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility
    Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel
    Soto-Acosta, Pedro
    Wensley, Anthony K. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (05) : 1544 - 1549
  • [7] How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity
    Cenamor, Javier
    Parida, Vinit
    Wincent, Joakim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2019, 100 : 196 - 206
  • [8] Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers
    Chesbrough, Henry
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2010, 43 (2-3) : 354 - 363
  • [9] To what extent do young innovative companies take advantage of policy support to enact innovation appropriation mechanisms?
    Colombelli, Alessandra
    Grilli, Luca
    Minola, Tommaso
    Mrkajic, Boris
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (10)
  • [10] The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness
    Gaglio, CM
    Katz, JA
    [J]. SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2001, 16 (02) : 95 - 111