Contraceptive use and pregnancy planning in Britain during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID)

被引:7
作者
Baxter, Andrew J. [1 ]
Geary, Rebecca S. [2 ]
Dema, Emily [3 ]
Boso Perez, Raquel [1 ]
Riddell, Julie [1 ]
Willis, Malachi [1 ]
Conolly, Anne [3 ,4 ]
Oakley, Laura L. [5 ,6 ]
Copas, Andrew J. [3 ]
Gibbs, Jo [3 ]
Bonell, Christopher [6 ]
Sonnenberg, Pam [3 ]
Mercer, Catherine H. [3 ]
Clifton, Soazig [3 ,4 ]
Field, Nigel [3 ]
Mitchell, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow G12 8TB, Scotland
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth, Liverpool, England
[3] UCL, Inst Global Hlth, London, England
[4] NatCen Social Res, London, England
[5] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Fertil & Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[6] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
reproductive health; sexual health; COVID-19; family planning services; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; SEXUAL ATTITUDES; NATIONAL-SURVEY; HEALTH; PREVALENCE; FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201763
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
BackgroundContraceptive services were significantly disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic in Britain. We investigated contraception-related health inequalities in the first year of the pandemic. MethodsNatsal-COVID Wave 2 surveyed 6658 adults aged 18-59 years between March and April 2021, using quotas and weighting to achieve quasi-representativeness. Our analysis included sexually active participants aged 18-44 years, described as female at birth. We analysed contraception use, contraceptive switching due to the pandemic, contraceptive service access, and pregnancy plannedness. ResultsOf 1488 participants, 1619 were at risk of unplanned pregnancy, of whom 54.1% (51.0%-57.1%) reported routinely using effective contraception in the past year. Among all participants, 14.3% (12.5%-16.3%) reported switching or stopping contraception due to the pandemic. 3.2% (2.0%-5.1%) of those using effective methods pre-pandemic switched to less effective methods, while 3.8% (2.5%-5.9%) stopped. 29.3% (26.9%-31.8%) of at-risk participants reported seeking contraceptive services, of whom 16.4% (13.0%-20.4%) reported difficulty accessing services. Clinic closures and cancelled appointments were commonly reported pandemic-related reasons for difficulty accessing services. This unmet need was associated with younger age, diverse sexual identities and anxiety symptoms. Of 199 pregnancies, 6.6% (3.9%-11.1%) scored as 'unplanned'; less planning was associated with younger age, lower social grade and unemployment. ConclusionsJust under a third of participants sought contraceptive services during the pandemic and most were successful, indicating resilience and adaptability of service delivery. However, one in six reported an unmet need due to the pandemic. COVID-induced inequalities in service access potentially exacerbated existing reproductive health inequalities. These should be addressed in the post-pandemic period and beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 273
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aicken C., 2022, SOC SOC MED ANN SCI, pA78, DOI [10.1136/jech-2022-SSMabstracts.164, DOI 10.1136/JECH-2022-SSMABSTRACTS.164]
[2]   Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on access to contraception and pregnancy intentions: a national prospective cohort study of the UK population [J].
Balachandren, Neerujah ;
Barrett, Geraldine ;
Stephenson, Judith M. ;
Yasmin, Ephia ;
Mavrelos, Dimitrios ;
Davies, Melanie ;
David, Anna ;
Hall, Jennifer Anne .
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 48 (01) :60-65
[3]  
Barrett G., 2021, LONDON MEASURE UNPLA
[4]   London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy and newer family forms: an update [J].
Barrett, Geraldine ;
Nolan, Elizabeth Mary ;
Gurtin, Zeynep B. ;
Stephenson, Judith ;
Hall, Jennifer Anne .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 (09) :765-765
[5]   The impact of COVID-19 on contraception and abortion care policy and practice: experiences from selected countries [J].
Bateson, Deborah J. ;
Lohr, Patricia A. ;
Norman, Wendy V. ;
Moreau, Caroline ;
Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina ;
Blumenthal, Paul D. ;
Hoggart, Lesley ;
Li, Hang-Wun Raymond ;
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Black, Kirsten I. .
BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 46 (04) :241-243
[6]  
Berrington A., 2021, RECENT TRENDS UK FER
[7]  
British Association for Sexual Health and HIV, 2020, BASHH COVID 19 SEX H
[8]   Love during lockdown: findings from an online survey examining the impact of COVID-19 on the sexual health of people living in Australia [J].
Coombe, Jacqueline ;
Kong, Fabian Yuh Shiong ;
Bittleston, Helen ;
Williams, Henrietta ;
Tomnay, Jane ;
Vaisey, Alaina ;
Malta, Sue ;
Goller, Jane L. ;
Temple-Smith, Meredith ;
Bourchier, Louise ;
Lau, Andrew ;
Chow, Eric P. F. ;
Hocking, Jane S. .
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2021, 97 (05) :357-362
[9]  
Dema Emily, 2022, Wellcome Open Res, V7, P166, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17850.2
[10]   Initial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health service use and unmet need in Britain: findings from a quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID) [J].
Dema, Emily ;
Gibbs, Jo ;
Clifton, Soazig ;
Copas, Andrew J. ;
Tanton, Clare ;
Riddell, Julie ;
Perez, Raquel Boso ;
Reid, David ;
Bonell, Chris ;
Unemo, Magnus ;
Mercer, Catherine H. ;
Mitchell, Kirstin R. ;
Sonnenberg, Pam ;
Field, Nigel .
LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 7 (01) :E36-E47