The impact of board reforms on audit fees: International evidence

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Incheol [1 ]
Kong, Joon Ho [2 ]
Yang, Rong [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Dept Finance, Edinburg, TX USA
[2] Stevens Inst Technol, Dept Accounting, Hoboken, NJ 07030 USA
[3] Rochester Inst Technol, Dept Finance & Accounting, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Analyst Forecast; Audit Committee; Audit Fee; Audit Quality; Big N Auditors; Board Independence; Board Reform; Corporate Governance; International Accounting; Restatement; FINANCIAL-REPORTING FAILURE; ACCOUNTING RESTATEMENTS; LITIGATION RISK; DIRECTOR CHARACTERISTICS; INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; QUALITY INSIGHTS; COMMITTEE; EXPERTISE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1111/jbfa.12685
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this study, we investigate whether and to what extent country-level board reforms affect audit pricing decisions. We find audit fees are positively associated with board reforms. An increase in audit fees is more pronounced for firms that switched up to Big N auditors following board reforms. After board reforms, firms are less likely to issue restatements, and both analyst forecast accuracy and management forecast frequency increase, indicating improved audit quality and information transparency in the postreform period. Moreover, the positive relation between board reforms and audit fees is more evident for firms in countries that lack institutional governance mechanisms, captured by emerging capital markets, high political risk, weak governmental enforcement actions and low corporate governance quality. Overall, our findings broadly support the view that audit fees increase upon demand for better audit quality.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 83
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Board Independence Affect Audit Fees? Evidence from Recent Regulatory Reforms
    Zhang, John Ziyang
    Yu, Yangxin
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 25 (04) : 793 - 814
  • [2] Gender diversity on audit committees and its impact on audit fees: evidence from India
    Miglani, Seema
    Ahmed, Kamran
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 32 (04) : 568 - 586
  • [3] Director turnover, board monitoring and audit fees: Some Australian evidence
    Kanapathippillai, Sutharson
    Yaftian, Ali
    Mirshekary, Soheila
    Sami, Heibatollah
    Gul, Ferdinand A.
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 83
  • [4] Workforce environment and audit fees: International evidence
    Sun, Xuan Sean
    Habib, Ahsan
    Bhuiyan, Borhan Uddin
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2020, 16 (01)
  • [5] Audit fees, board ethnicity and board independence: evidence from South Africa
    Muniandy, Balachandran
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2022, 37 (04) : 409 - 437
  • [6] Assessing the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on audit fees: an international evidence
    Alkebsee, Radwan Hussien
    Azibi, Jamel
    Koutoupis, Andreas
    Dimitriou, Theodora
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2023,
  • [7] Board reforms and the cost of equity: International evidence
    Li, Maoliang
    Wu, Ji
    Zhang, Liansheng
    Zou, Liping
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2020, 60 (05) : 4497 - 4531
  • [8] Board reforms and the choice of debt: international evidence
    Xiao, Yige
    Tsang, Albert
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (01) : 240 - 273
  • [9] Impact of the audit committee on audit fees: A review and future research agenda
    Nerantzidis, Michail
    Koutoupis, Andreas
    Drogalas, George
    Vadasi, Christina
    Mitskinis, Dimitrios
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [10] The Impact of Board Interlocks on Auditor Choice and Audit Fees
    Johansen, Thomas Riise
    Pettersson, Kim
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 21 (03) : 287 - 310