Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review

被引:2
作者
Charters, Emma [1 ]
Pelham, Claire [1 ]
Novakovic, Daniel [2 ]
Madill, Cate [3 ]
Clark, Jonathan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Speech Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Sydney Head & Neck Canc Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Prince Alfred Inst Acad Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC); transoral robotic surgery (TORS); Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI); speech; swallow; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; NECK-CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; INSUFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/17549507.2022.2104927
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) is a known consequence that may contribute to swallowing and speech disorders. As the incidence of OPC increases affecting a younger demographic, a better understanding of VPI is required to support speech and swallowing rehabilitation. Method: A scoping review was conducted using Arskey & O'Malley's framework. Studies were identified from five databases between 2007 and 2020. The methodological quality was measured with the RevMan Risk of Bias Tool by two independent evaluators. Result: A total of seven studies met the inclusion criterion. There was a combined total of 306 participants, their average age was 59.2 years. A high risk of bias and degree of heterogeneity across all seven cohort studies was observed. Validated and instrumental evaluations of VPI were present in two papers, with the majority only reporting the presence or absence of VPI. The incidence of VPI reported in each study ranged from 0 to 53%, (median 3.5%). Conclusion: There are few high-quality studies and considerable heterogeneity in the terminology, inclusion criteria and measurement of VPI. Instrumentation, to date, has been rarely used but is necessary for a normed and validated approach to VPI. Based on this review, there is considerable need for larger studies which instrumentally and longitudinally assess VPI as a consequence of TORS, in order to guide patient education and management prior to, and following their surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transoral robotic surgery for the management of oropharyngeal minor salivary gland tumors
    Villanueva, Nathaniel L.
    de Almeida, John R.
    Sikora, Andrew G.
    Miles, Brett A.
    Genden, Eric M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (01): : 28 - 33
  • [42] The Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of HPV Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Sload, Ryan
    Silver, Natalie
    Jawad, Basit Abjul
    Gross, Neil D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (09)
  • [43] Transoral Surgery or Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma - Is It Either Or ... ?
    Evans, M.
    Jones, T. M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (07) : 413 - 420
  • [44] Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery
    Hay, A.
    Migliacci, J.
    Zanoni, D. Karassawa
    Boyle, J. O.
    Singh, B.
    Wong, R. J.
    Patel, S. G.
    Ganly, I.
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 43 (02) : 638 - 644
  • [45] Swallowing and communication outcomes following primary transoral robotic surgery for advanced or recurrent oropharyngeal cancer: Case series
    Charters, Emma
    Bogaardt, Hans
    Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
    Ballard, Kirrie
    Davies, Sarah
    Oates, Justine
    Clark, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 407 - 416
  • [46] Management of Recurrent and Metastatic HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Transoral Robotic Surgery
    Sims, John R.
    Van Abel, Kathryn
    Martin, Eliot J.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Price, Daniel L.
    Olsen, Kerry D.
    Moore, Eric J.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 157 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [47] Outcomes following transoral robotic surgery: Supraglottic laryngectomy
    Mendelsohn, Abie H.
    Remacle, Marc
    Van der Vorst, Sebastien
    Bachy, Vincent
    Lawson, Georges
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2013, 123 (01) : 208 - 214
  • [48] A systematic review and meta-analysis of margins in transoral surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma
    Gorphe, Philippe
    Simon, Christian
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 98 : 69 - 77
  • [49] Quality of life after radiation and transoral robotic surgery in advanced oropharyngeal cancer
    Kaffenberger, Thomas M.
    Patel, Ankur K.
    Lyu, Lingyun
    Li, Jinhong
    Wasserman-Wincko, Tamara
    Zandberg, Dan P.
    Clump, David A.
    Johnson, Jonas T.
    Nilsen, Marci L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05): : 983 - 990
  • [50] Transoral Robotic Surgery and Human Papillomavirus Infection: Impact on Oropharyngeal Cancer Prognosis
    Chen, Jingtao
    Zhang, Xing
    Yan, Shida
    Li, Xiyuan
    Li, Menghua
    Zhang, Ying
    Zhang, Shiting
    Li, Fengjiao
    Song, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)