Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Charters, Emma [1 ]
Pelham, Claire [1 ]
Novakovic, Daniel [2 ]
Madill, Cate [3 ]
Clark, Jonathan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Speech Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Sydney Head & Neck Canc Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Prince Alfred Inst Acad Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC); transoral robotic surgery (TORS); Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI); speech; swallow; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; NECK-CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; INSUFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/17549507.2022.2104927
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) is a known consequence that may contribute to swallowing and speech disorders. As the incidence of OPC increases affecting a younger demographic, a better understanding of VPI is required to support speech and swallowing rehabilitation. Method: A scoping review was conducted using Arskey & O'Malley's framework. Studies were identified from five databases between 2007 and 2020. The methodological quality was measured with the RevMan Risk of Bias Tool by two independent evaluators. Result: A total of seven studies met the inclusion criterion. There was a combined total of 306 participants, their average age was 59.2 years. A high risk of bias and degree of heterogeneity across all seven cohort studies was observed. Validated and instrumental evaluations of VPI were present in two papers, with the majority only reporting the presence or absence of VPI. The incidence of VPI reported in each study ranged from 0 to 53%, (median 3.5%). Conclusion: There are few high-quality studies and considerable heterogeneity in the terminology, inclusion criteria and measurement of VPI. Instrumentation, to date, has been rarely used but is necessary for a normed and validated approach to VPI. Based on this review, there is considerable need for larger studies which instrumentally and longitudinally assess VPI as a consequence of TORS, in order to guide patient education and management prior to, and following their surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The reconstructive options for oropharyngeal defects in the transoral robotic surgery framework
    Meccariello, Giuseppe
    Montevecchi, Filippo
    Sgarzani, Rossella
    De Vito, Andrea
    D'Agostino, Giovanni
    Gobbi, Riccardo
    Bellini, Chiara
    Vicini, Claudio
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 108 - 111
  • [32] National Trends in 30-Day Readmission Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Nyirjesy, Sarah C.
    McCrary, Hilary C.
    Zhao, Songzhu
    Judd, Ryan T.
    Farlow, Janice L.
    Seim, Nolan B.
    Ozer, Enver
    Agrawal, Amit
    Old, Matthew O.
    Rocco, James W.
    Kang, Stephen Y.
    Haring, Catherine T.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 150 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [33] Oncologic Outcomes Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Patients
    Parhar, Harman S.
    Shimunov, David
    Newman, Jason G.
    Cannady, Steven B.
    Rajasekaran, Karthik
    O' Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    Chalian, Ara A.
    Rassekh, Christopher H.
    Cohen, Roger B.
    Lin, Alexander
    Lukens, John
    Swisher-McClure, Samuelyy
    Bauml, Joshua
    Aggarwal, Charu
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    Brody, Robert M.
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 146 (12) : 1167 - 1175
  • [34] Adjuvant Proton Radiation Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Tong, Jane Y.
    Bzhilyanskaya, Vera
    Ferris, Matthew J.
    Molitoris, Jason K.
    Hatten, Kyle M.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2025, : 1309 - 1317
  • [35] Long-term functional swallowing and speech outcomes after transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer
    Ji, Yong Bae
    Choi, Hae Won
    Song, Chang Myeon
    Yun, Bo Ram
    Park, Hae Jin
    Oh, Sukjoong
    Tae, Kyung
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [36] Return to work and self-reported swallowing following transoral robotic surgery for early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
    Staibano, Phillip
    Au, Michael
    Xie, Michael
    Gupta, Michael K.
    Young, James Edward Massey
    Zhang, Han
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 159
  • [37] Transoral robotic surgery vs. radiotherapy for management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - A systematic review of the literature
    Yeh, D. H.
    Tam, S.
    Fung, K.
    MacNeil, S. D.
    Yoo, J.
    Winquist, E.
    Palma, D. A.
    Nichols, A. C.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (12): : 1603 - 1614
  • [38] Current Indications for Transoral Robotic Surgery in Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Parhar, Harman S.
    Yver, Christina M.
    Brody, Robert M.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2020, 53 (06) : 949 - +
  • [39] Early postoperative functional outcomes following transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review
    Stephen, Sarah E.
    Murphy, Jennifer M.
    Beyer, Fiona R.
    Sellstrom, Diane
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Patterson, Joanne M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2022, 44 (02): : 530 - 547
  • [40] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: patient selection and special considerations
    Baskin, R. Michael
    Boyce, Brian J.
    Amdur, Robert
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Hitchcock, Kathryn
    Silver, Natalie
    Dziegielewski, Peter T.
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2018, 10 : 839 - 846