Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Charters, Emma [1 ]
Pelham, Claire [1 ]
Novakovic, Daniel [2 ]
Madill, Cate [3 ]
Clark, Jonathan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Speech Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Sydney Head & Neck Canc Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Prince Alfred Inst Acad Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC); transoral robotic surgery (TORS); Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI); speech; swallow; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; NECK-CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; INSUFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/17549507.2022.2104927
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) is a known consequence that may contribute to swallowing and speech disorders. As the incidence of OPC increases affecting a younger demographic, a better understanding of VPI is required to support speech and swallowing rehabilitation. Method: A scoping review was conducted using Arskey & O'Malley's framework. Studies were identified from five databases between 2007 and 2020. The methodological quality was measured with the RevMan Risk of Bias Tool by two independent evaluators. Result: A total of seven studies met the inclusion criterion. There was a combined total of 306 participants, their average age was 59.2 years. A high risk of bias and degree of heterogeneity across all seven cohort studies was observed. Validated and instrumental evaluations of VPI were present in two papers, with the majority only reporting the presence or absence of VPI. The incidence of VPI reported in each study ranged from 0 to 53%, (median 3.5%). Conclusion: There are few high-quality studies and considerable heterogeneity in the terminology, inclusion criteria and measurement of VPI. Instrumentation, to date, has been rarely used but is necessary for a normed and validated approach to VPI. Based on this review, there is considerable need for larger studies which instrumentally and longitudinally assess VPI as a consequence of TORS, in order to guide patient education and management prior to, and following their surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oropharyngeal reconstruction after transoral robotic surgery
    Silverman, Dustin A.
    Birkeland, Andrew C.
    Bewley, Arnaud F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 30 (05) : 384 - 391
  • [22] Transoral robotic surgery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of the oropharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Virgilio, Armando
    Costantino, Andrea
    Mercante, Giuseppe
    Pellini, Raul
    Ferreli, Fabio
    Malvezzi, Luca
    Colombo, Giovanni
    Cugini, Giovanni
    Petruzzi, Gerardo
    Spriano, Giuseppe
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (05) : 1321 - 1335
  • [23] Facial artery musculomucosal flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction following salvage transoral robotic surgery: a review of outcomes
    Asairinachan, A.
    O'Duffy, F.
    Li, M. P.
    Fua, T.
    Chauhan, A.
    Magarey, M. J. R.
    Dixon, B. J.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2019, 133 (10) : 884 - 888
  • [24] Decisional regret, symptom burden, and quality of life following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer
    Kwon, Jamie Jae Young
    Liu, Alice Q.
    Milner, Thomas D.
    Prisman, Eitan
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 146
  • [25] Swallowing Function Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma: A 2-Year Follow-up
    Lee, Esther
    Gorelik, Daniel
    Crowder, Hannah R.
    Badger, Christopher
    Schottler, Jennifer
    Li, Ning-Wei
    Siegel, Robert
    Sadeghi, Nader
    Goodman, Joseph F.
    Thakkar, Punam G.
    Joshi, Arjun S.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 167 (02) : 298 - 304
  • [26] Revisiting Vascular Contraindications for Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Gorphe, Philippe
    Auperin, Anne
    Honart, Jean-Francois
    Van, Jean Ton
    El Bedoui, Sophie
    Bidault, Francois
    Temam, Stephane
    Kolb, Frederic
    Qassemyar, Quentin
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 3 (02): : 121 - 126
  • [27] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal and Tongue Cancer in the United States
    Chung, Thomas K.
    Rosenthal, Eben L.
    Magnuson, J. Scott
    Carroll, William R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (01) : 140 - 145
  • [28] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in the era of chemoradiation therapy
    Meccariello, Giuseppe
    Cammaroto, Giovanni
    Iannella, Giannicola
    De Vito, Andrea
    Ciorba, Andrea
    Bianchini, Chiara
    Corazzi, Virginia
    Pelucchi, Stefano
    Vicini, Claudio
    Capaccio, Pasquale
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2022, 49 (04) : 535 - 546
  • [29] Pediatric transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal malignancy: A case report
    Wine, Todd M.
    Duvvuri, Umamaheswar
    Maurer, Scott H.
    Mehta, Deepak K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 77 (07) : 1222 - 1226
  • [30] Opioid Usage and Prescribing Predictors Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Abt, Nicholas B.
    Holcomb, Andrew J.
    Feng, Allen L.
    Suresh, Krish
    Mokhtari, Tara E.
    McHugh, Christopher I.
    Parikh, Anuraag S.
    Faden, Daniel L.
    Deschler, Daniel G.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Lin, Derrick T.
    Richmon, Jeremy D.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (06) : E1888 - E1894