Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review

被引:2
|
作者
Charters, Emma [1 ]
Pelham, Claire [1 ]
Novakovic, Daniel [2 ]
Madill, Cate [3 ]
Clark, Jonathan [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Speech Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Sydney Head & Neck Canc Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Royal Prince Alfred Inst Acad Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC); transoral robotic surgery (TORS); Velopharyngeal Insufficiency (VPI); speech; swallow; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; NECK-CANCER; RECONSTRUCTION; HEAD; INSUFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/17549507.2022.2104927
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: Following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC), velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) is a known consequence that may contribute to swallowing and speech disorders. As the incidence of OPC increases affecting a younger demographic, a better understanding of VPI is required to support speech and swallowing rehabilitation. Method: A scoping review was conducted using Arskey & O'Malley's framework. Studies were identified from five databases between 2007 and 2020. The methodological quality was measured with the RevMan Risk of Bias Tool by two independent evaluators. Result: A total of seven studies met the inclusion criterion. There was a combined total of 306 participants, their average age was 59.2 years. A high risk of bias and degree of heterogeneity across all seven cohort studies was observed. Validated and instrumental evaluations of VPI were present in two papers, with the majority only reporting the presence or absence of VPI. The incidence of VPI reported in each study ranged from 0 to 53%, (median 3.5%). Conclusion: There are few high-quality studies and considerable heterogeneity in the terminology, inclusion criteria and measurement of VPI. Instrumentation, to date, has been rarely used but is necessary for a normed and validated approach to VPI. Based on this review, there is considerable need for larger studies which instrumentally and longitudinally assess VPI as a consequence of TORS, in order to guide patient education and management prior to, and following their surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 548
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal andHypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Tan, Wilhelmina
    Bui, Rebecca
    Ranasinghe, Viran J.
    Coblens, Orly
    Shabani, Sepehr
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [2] Transoral Robotic Surgery in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
    Helman, Samuel N.
    Schwedhelm, Thomas
    Kadakia, Sameep
    Wang, Yanhua
    Schiff, Bradley A.
    Smith, Richard V.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 139 (11) : 1389 - 1397
  • [3] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Schmitt, Nicole C.
    Duvvuri, Umamaheswar
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 23 (02) : 127 - 131
  • [4] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a scoping review of novel techniques in margin assessment
    Goel, Sahil
    Krishnan, Giri
    Krishnan, Suren
    Hodge, John-Charles
    Foreman, Andrew
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 7
  • [5] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Advanced Oropharyngeal Carcinoma
    Weinstein, Gregory S.
    O'Malley, Bert W., Jr.
    Cohen, Marc A.
    Quon, Harry
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2010, 136 (11) : 1079 - 1085
  • [6] The Role of Transoral Robotic Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Current Review
    Sansoni, E. Ritter
    Gross, Neil D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (03)
  • [7] The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal cancer
    Dias, Fernando L.
    Walder, Fernando
    Leonhardt, Fernando Danelon
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 29 (03) : 166 - 171
  • [8] Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: Surgical margins and oncologic outcomes
    Moore, Eric J.
    Van Abel, Kathryn M.
    Price, Daniel L.
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Olsen, Kerry D.
    Jackson, Ryan S.
    Martin, Eliot J.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (04): : 747 - 755
  • [9] Evaluating dysphagia and xerostomia outcomes following transoral robotic surgery for patients with oropharyngeal cancer
    Mehta, Mitesh P.
    Prince, Rebecca
    Butt, Zeeshan
    Maxwell, Bryce E.
    Carnes, Brittni N.
    Patel, Urjeet A.
    Stepan, Katelyn O.
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    Samant, Sandeep
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (12): : 3955 - 3965
  • [10] Feeding Tube Placement Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Feng, Allen L.
    Holcomb, Andrew J.
    Abt, Nicholas B.
    Mokhtari, Tara E.
    Suresh, Krish
    McHugh, Christopher, I
    Parikh, Anuraag S.
    Holman, Allison
    Kammer, Rachael E.
    Goldsmith, Tessa A.
    Faden, Daniel L.
    Deschler, Daniel G.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Lin, Derrick T.
    Richmon, Jeremy D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2022, 166 (04) : 696 - 703