Association of immune inflammatory biomarkers with pathological complete response and clinical prognosis in young breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:4
作者
Li, Fucheng [1 ]
Wang, Youyu [1 ]
Dou, He [1 ]
Chen, Xingyan [1 ]
Wang, Jianan [1 ]
Xiao, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Canc Hosp, Harbin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
immune inflammatory biomarker; young women; breast cancer; pathological complete response; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV); CELL LUNG-CANCER; LYMPHOCYTE; NEUTROPHIL; MECHANISMS; CONSENSUS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1349021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The persistence of inflammatory stimulus has a tight relationship with the development of age-related diseases, ultimately resulting in a gradual escalation in the prevalence of tumors, but this phenomenon is rare in young cancer patients. Breast cancer arising in young women is characterized by larger tumor diameters and more aggressive subtypes, so neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can be especially appropriate for this population. Immune inflammatory biomarkers have been reportedly linked to the prognosis of some malignant tumor types, with varying results. In this study, we investigated the possible predictive value of blood-based markers in young breast cancer patients undergoing NACT, in addition to the association between the clinicopathological features and prognosis.Methods From December 2011 to October 2018, a total of 215 young breast cancer patients referred to Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital received NACT and surgery were registered in this retrospective study. The pretreatment complete blood counts were used to calculate the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV).Results NLR, PLR, MLR, and PIV optimal cut-off values were 1.55, 130.66, 0.24, and 243.19, as determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that PIV, HR status, HER-2 status, and Ki-67 index were all independent predictive factors for pathological complete response. Subgroup analysis revealed that young breast cancer patients in the population characterized by low PIV and HR negative group were more likely to get pCR (P=0.001). The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.9%, and Cox regression models identified PIV as independently related to OS.Conclusion In the present study, the pretreatment PIV was found to be a useful prognostic indicator for pCR and long-term survival in young breast cancer patients undergoing NACT. High immune and inflammation levels, MLR and PIV were connected to poor clinical prognosis in young breast cancer patients. PIV is a promising biomarker to guide strategic decisions in treating young breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pretreatment systemic inflammation response index is predictive of pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Jie Dong
    Qingqing Sun
    Yueyin Pan
    Nannan Lu
    Xinghua Han
    Qiong Zhou
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [32] Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer
    Ring, AE
    Smith, IE
    Ashley, S
    Fulford, LG
    Lakhani, SR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (12) : 2012 - 2017
  • [33] Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer
    A E Ring
    I E Smith
    S Ashley
    L G Fulford
    S R Lakhani
    British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 2012 - 2017
  • [34] Pretreatment systemic inflammation response index is predictive of pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Dong, Jie
    Sun, Qingqing
    Pan, Yueyin
    Lu, Nannan
    Han, Xinghua
    Zhou, Qiong
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [35] Optical Mammography in Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Individual Clinical Response Index
    Anderson, Pamela G.
    Kalli, Sirishma
    Sassaroli, Angelo
    Krishnamurthy, Nishanth
    Makim, Shital S.
    Graham, Roger A.
    Fantini, Sergio
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (10) : 1240 - 1255
  • [36] The predictive value of systemic immune-inflammatory markers before and after treatment for pathological complete response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study of 1994 patients
    Wang, Huibo
    Huang, Zhenfeng
    Xu, Bingqi
    Zhang, Jinxing
    He, Pengfei
    Gao, Fei
    Zhang, Ruifeng
    Huang, Xiatian
    Shan, Ming
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 26 (06) : 1467 - 1479
  • [37] Construction of novel immune-related signature for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in human breast cancer
    Sota, Y.
    Naoi, Y.
    Tsunashima, R.
    Kagara, N.
    Shimazu, K.
    Maruyama, N.
    Shimomura, A.
    Shimoda, M.
    Kishi, K.
    Baba, Y.
    Kim, S. J.
    Noguchi, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [38] Radiomics of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Zhang, Kun
    Lin, Jun
    Lin, Fan
    Wang, Zhongyi
    Zhang, Haicheng
    Zhang, Shijie
    Mao, Ning
    Qiao, Guangdong
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 31 (04) : 669 - 683
  • [39] Impact of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer according to molecular subtype
    Cirier, J.
    Body, G.
    Jourdan, M. -L.
    Bedouet, L.
    Fleurier, C.
    Pilloy, J.
    Arbion, F.
    Ouldamer, L.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2017, 45 (10): : 535 - 544
  • [40] Computer-aided classification of MRI for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Yan, Shaolei
    Peng, Haiyong
    Yu, Qiujie
    Chen, Xiaodan
    Liu, Yue
    Zhu, Ye
    Chen, Kaige
    Wang, Ping
    Li, Yujiao
    Zhang, Xiushi
    Meng, Wei
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (08) : 991 - 1001