Benefits of a Postoperative Hip Orthosis After Routine Arthroscopy of the Hip: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:1
作者
Wentzel, Dylan [1 ,2 ]
Enos, Jake [1 ]
Smoak, Jason [1 ]
Goodman, Ian [1 ]
Mar, Damon [1 ]
Vopat, Bryan [1 ]
Mullen, Scott [1 ]
Schroeppel, John Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthoped Surg & Sports Med, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Orthoped Surg & Sports Med, Med Ctr, 3901Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
关键词
clinical assessment/grading scales; hip arthroscopy; hip femoroacetabular impingement; physical therapy/rehabilitation; OUTCOMES; SEX;
D O I
10.1177/23259671231212503
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:No consensus currently exists among orthopaedic surgeons regarding the benefits of hip orthosis after routine hip arthroscopy.Purpose:To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and reoperation rates between patients who were braced versus those who were not braced after routine hip arthroscopy.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A retrospective review was conducted of 193 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, by 2 orthopedic surgeons at a single institution. Patients before July 1, 2019, were immobilized in a hip orthosis after hip arthroscopy (braced group; n = 101), whereas those after July 1, 2019, were not (nonbraced group; n = 92). Baseline PROMs (visual analog scale for pain, modified Harris Hip Score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey [VR-12] Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary) were obtained for all patients and were repeated postoperatively at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. The study groups were compared to evaluate differences in PROMs over time and 2-year postoperative reoperation rates. Group comparisons were also stratified by patient sex.Results:There were no significant differences on any PROM between the braced and nonbraced cohorts at any timepoint. There were also no significant group differences in reoperation rates, with 8 braced patients (7.9%) undergoing reoperation and 1 nonbraced patient (2.3%) undergoing reoperation (P = .208). In the sex-stratified analyses, nonbraced male patients had significantly higher VAS pain and lower VR-12 Mental Component Summary scores at 6 months postoperatively compared with braced male patients (P = .043 and .026, respectively).Conclusion:The study findings suggested that the use of an orthosis after routine hip arthroscopy for FAI does not improve patient-reported outcomes or negatively affect the 2-year reoperation rate. Postoperative bracing increases perioperative cost, and by foregoing routine bracing, patients may avoid the morbidity associated with wearing a brace for a prolonged period.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [11] Correlation of Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation Score for Sport and Activities of Daily Living to Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Surgery
    Lau, Brian C.
    Scribani, Melissa
    Lassiter, Tally
    Wittstein, Jocelyn
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (11) : 2646 - 2650
  • [12] The current situation in hip arthroscopy
    Marin-Pena, Oliver
    Tey-Pons, Marc
    Perez-Carro, Luis
    Said, Hatem G.
    Sierra, Pablo
    Dantas, Pedro
    Villar, Richard N.
    [J]. EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2017, 2 (03): : 58 - 65
  • [13] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy
    Martin, RobRoy L.
    Kivlan, Benjamin R.
    Christoforetti, John J.
    Wolff, Andrew B.
    Nho, Shane J.
    Salvo, John P., Jr.
    Ellis, Thomas J.
    Van Thiel, Geoff
    Matsuda, Dean
    Carreira, Dominic S.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (07) : 2064 - 2069
  • [14] Effects of a hip brace on biomechanics and pain in people with femoroacetabular impingement
    Newcomb, Nicolas R. A.
    Wrigley, Tim V.
    Hinman, Rana S.
    Kasza, Jessica
    Spiers, Libby
    O'Donnell, John
    Bennell, Kim L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2018, 21 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [15] Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit After Revision Hip Arthroscopy
    Nwachukwu, Benedict U.
    Chang, Brenda
    Rotter, Ben-Zion
    Kelly, Bryan T.
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    Nawabi, Danyal H.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (06) : 1862 - 1868
  • [16] Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Sardana, Vandit
    Philippon, Marc J.
    de Sa, Darren
    Bedi, Asheesh
    Ye, Lily
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (10) : 2047 - 2055
  • [17] Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy
    Stalzer, S
    Wahoff, M
    Scanlan, M
    [J]. CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (02) : 337 - +
  • [18] Does Capsular Closure Affect Clinical Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sugarman, Etan P.
    Birns, Michael E.
    Fishman, Matthew
    Patel, Deepan N.
    Goldsmith, Laura
    Greene, Renee S.
    Banffy, Michael B.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [19] Complication Rates for Hip Arthroscopy Are Underestimated: A Population-Based Study
    Truntzer, Jeremy N.
    Hoppe, Daniel J.
    Shapiro, Lauren M.
    Abrams, Geoffrey D.
    Safran, Marc
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (06) : 1194 - 1201
  • [20] West Christopher R, 2019, Iowa Orthop J, V39, P95