Efficient Measurement of Writing Knowledge with Forced-Choice Tasks: Preliminary Data Using the Student Knowledge of Writing Test

被引:0
作者
Troia, Gary A. [1 ,5 ]
Lawrence, Frank R. [1 ]
Brehmer, Julie S. [2 ]
Glause, Kaitlin [3 ]
Reichmuth, Heather L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Saginaw Valley State Univ, University Ctr, MI USA
[3] Millikin Univ, Decatur, IL USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Gorham, ME USA
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Counseling Educ Psychol & Special Educ, 620 Farm Lane, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
writing knowledge; writing quality; assessment; late elementary; LINGUISTIC KNOWLEDGE; DISCOURSE KNOWLEDGE; METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN; GRADE; ADOLESCENTS; INSTRUCTION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; PROFICIENCY;
D O I
10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.06
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Much of the research that has examined the writing knowledge of school-age students has relied on interviews to ascertain this information, which is problematic because interviews may underestimate breadth and depth of writing knowledge, require lengthy interactions with participants, and do not permit a direct evaluation of a prescribed array of constituent knowledge elements. For these reasons, our goal in this study is to report the development, piloting, and field testing, using a sample of 335 students from grades 4 and 5, of four alternate versions of a writing knowledge assessment-the Student Knowledge of Writing Test (SKOWT)-that uses forced-choice responses to evaluate students' knowledge of writing processes, genre elements, and linguistic features of written language. All versions of the SKOWT demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability and construct validity based on exploratory factor analyses following deletion of some items. In addition, there was acceptable predictive criterion validity based on associations of SKOWT scores with subtests from the Test of Written Language-4 and measures of narrative, opinion, and informative essay quality. We discuss how the SKOWT might be used in future research and educational practice.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 427
页数:33
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Individual differences in interest and narrative writing [J].
Albin, M ;
Benton, SL ;
Khramtsova, I .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 21 (04) :305-324
[2]  
Alexander P.A., 2003, Educational Researcher, V32, P10, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X032008010, 10.3102/0013189X032008010]
[3]  
Alexander P. A., 1997, Skill, will, and self-regulation
[4]  
Apel K., 2004, Language and literacy learning in schools, P292
[5]  
Baker FB, 2017, STAT SOC BEHAV SC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-54205-8
[6]   What happens when I write? Pupils' writing about writing [J].
Barbeiro, Luis Filipe .
READING AND WRITING, 2011, 24 (07) :813-834
[7]   Awaiting a new wave: The status of state writing assessment in the United States [J].
Behizadeh, Nadia ;
Pang, Myoung Eun .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2016, 29 :25-41
[8]   KNOWLEDGE, INTEREST, AND NARRATIVE WRITING [J].
BENTON, SL ;
CORKILL, AJ ;
SHARP, JM ;
DOWNEY, RG ;
KHRAMTSOVA, I .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 87 (01) :66-79
[9]  
Bereiter C., 1984, WRIT COMMUN, V1, P163, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0741088384001002001, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001002001]
[10]  
Berman R.A., 1994, Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study