Electricity sector reforms and cost efficiency: The case of small electricity systems in Sub-Sahara Africa

被引:2
作者
Asantewaa, Adwoa [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Jamasb, Tooraj [3 ]
Llorca, Manuel [3 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Durham, Business Sch, Durham, England
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen Sch Energy Infrastructure CSEI, Dept Econ, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[4] World Bank Grp, 701 18th St NW, Washington, DC 20006 USA
关键词
Small electricity systems; Sub-Saharan Africa; Cost recovery; Cost-efficiency; Electricity prices; Power distribution utilities; Electricity sector reforms; Competition; Hybrid electricity sectors; ECONOMIES; SCALE; DETERMINANTS; PROCUREMENT; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2023.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The financial viability of Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA) electricity sectors has become a central energy policy issue in recent years. This follows persistent under-recovery of costs which are amongst some of the highest in the world. Discussions, however, focus on tariff and utility reforms and inadequately on costs efficiency and the role of broader sector reforms in persistently high costs. Through a synthesis of reform theories and case studies and using small electricity systems as a surrogate for liberalized electricity sectors without competitive markets, this paper examines the connection between sector reforms and costs. It brings an economic perspective to the discussion on utility financial performance in SSA electricity systems and the need for a holistic policy approach for sustainable cost-recovery. In this, we recommend the promotion of mobile power plants to facilitate contestability in generation and need for non-island small systems to participate in regional power markets to neutralize the scale limitations of their autarkic demand. Utilities and regulatory agencies should form platforms to share information on cost opportunities and possibilities to inform procurement designs and regulatory benchmarks. Regional markets could partner with national governments to develop subsidy schemes such as Contracts for Differences to remove rigidities imposed by national power purchasing contracts to promote deeper participation of small systems in regional power markets. Yardstick competition in the distribution segment remains viable in many small electricity systems and should be pursued at the regional level in the short run to medium term and at the national levels in the long term following deconcentration and the introduction of private sector participation. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Economic Society of Australia, Queensland.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 893
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Ackah I., 2021, CASE STUDY GHANAS PO
  • [2] African Development Bank-AfDB, 2016, African Development Bank Report
  • [3] The determinants of contractual choice for private involvement in infrastructure projects
    Albalate, Daniel
    Bel, Germa
    Geddes, R. Richard
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (01) : 87 - 94
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, ENERGY SUBSIDY REFOR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, Electr. J.
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1982, Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure
  • [7] Armstrong H.W., 2004, ISLANDS WORLD 3 INT
  • [8] Armstrong M., 1994, REGULATORY REFORM EC
  • [9] The efficiency of state-owned and privatized firms: Does ownership make a difference?
    Arocena, Pablo
    Oliveros, Diana
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 140 (01) : 457 - 465
  • [10] Electricity Sector Reform Performance in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Parametric Distance Function Approach
    Asantewaa, Adwoa
    Jamasb, Tooraj
    Llorca, Manuel
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (06)