Relationship Satisfaction in Young Couples: Evidence for Validity of Short Scale Combining CFA and IRT

被引:9
作者
Ventura-Leon, Jose [1 ]
Lino-Cruz, Cristopher [2 ]
Caycho-Rodriguez, Tomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Privada Norte, Fac Ciencia Salud, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Peruana Ciencias Aplicadas, Fac Psicol, Lima, Peru
关键词
INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; ABUSE SCREENING TOOL; SHORT VERSION; MODEL; VALIDATION; PACKAGE; VALUES; FIT;
D O I
10.1080/0092623X.2022.2129119
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study aimed to validate a short relationship satisfaction scale (RAS) in a sample of young people and adults in the Lima metropolitan area. There were a total of 806 participants aged between 18 and 30 years: 622 females (77.20%) and 184 males (22.80%). Every participant was currently in a love relationship of a minimum of three months. The methodologies of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Item Response Theory (IRT) were combined to determine the structure and assess the reliability of the instrument. The Omega coefficient (omega) was used from CFA, while the test information function and empirical reliability (r(xx)) were used from IRT. The results showed that the RAS could be interpreted as a one-dimensional scale when eliminating the items 4-7 and joining the items 1-2. This model shows high goodness of fit from a CFA-perspective. A similar situation occurs in IRT, except that error covariance is not considered. Nevertheless, assuming the elimination of items 4-7 is still a good option. The reliability in both CFA (omega = .838) and IRT (r(xx) = .862) was satisfactory. The evidence of relationship with other variable showed inverse and big relationship with violent spells of tension and difficulty.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 431
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]  
Maxwell J. A., 1996, Qualitative research design: An interactive approach
[32]   Assessing Approximate Fit in Categorical Data Analysis [J].
Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto ;
Joe, Harry .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2014, 49 (04) :305-328
[33]  
Ministerio de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables, 2021, LIN 100 MIMP INCR 97
[34]   A New Strategy for Testing Structural Equation Models [J].
Moshagen, Morten ;
Erdfelder, Edgar .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (01) :54-60
[36]   Romantic relationship satisfaction, age, course load, satisfaction with income and parental status as predictors of instructors' burnout: Evidence from a correlational study [J].
Ozdemir, Bircan ;
Demir, Ayhan .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 38 (05) :1083-1098
[37]   Validation of the short version of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool for use in primary care in Spain [J].
Plazaola-Castano, Juncal ;
Ruiz-Perez, Isabel ;
Hernandez-Torres, Elisa .
GACETA SANITARIA, 2008, 22 (05) :415-420
[38]   lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling [J].
Rosseel, Yves .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2012, 48 (02) :1-36
[39]  
RStudio Team, 2022, RSTUDIO INT DEV R
[40]  
Rubia J., 2008, Revista Electronica de Metodologia Aplicada, V13, P1, DOI [DOI 10.17811/REMA.13.1.2008.1-12, 10.17811/rema.13.1.2008.1-12]