Flexible Aircraft Simulation Validation with Flight Test Data

被引:9
作者
Guimaraes Neto, Antonio B. [1 ]
Barbosa, Guilherme C. [2 ,5 ]
Paulino, Juliano A. [1 ]
Bertolin, Rafael M. [2 ,5 ]
Nunes, Jessica S. M. [2 ,6 ]
Gonzalez, Pedro J. [2 ,7 ]
Cardoso-Ribeiro, Flavio L. [1 ]
Morales, Mauricio A., V [1 ]
da Silva, Roberto G. A. [1 ]
Bussamra, Flavio L. S. [1 ]
Silvestre, Flavio J. [3 ]
Moreira, Fernando J. O. [4 ]
Cesnik, Carlos E. S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Aeronaut Inst Technol, Aerosp Engn Div, BR-12228900 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[2] Aeronaut Inst Technol, BR-12228900 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Chair Flight Mech Flight Control & Aeroelast, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[4] Embraer SA, Technol Dev Dept, BR-12247004 Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[7] DLR, German Aerosp Ctr, Inst Aeroelast, Cologne, Germany
关键词
LATTICE METHOD; X-HALE; DYNAMICS; AEROELASTICITY; VEHICLE;
D O I
10.2514/1.J060960
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The challenges of modeling flexible aircraft include appropriate fidelity capturing and validation with experimental data. In fact, the validation of formulations and models for the flexible flight dynamics is indispensable to ensure that all the important phenomena are correctly captured. With this objective, two high-aspect-ratio flexible aircraft have been flight-tested, and coupled aeroelastic-flight dynamics data have been collected to support model validation. Additional ground vibration and static tests were carried out to fully characterize the structural dynamic properties. Numerical models were built based on a linear structural representation but with geometrically nonlinear aerodynamics. Low Reynolds number effects were included in a simplified way with lookup tables of two-dimensional airfoil data. Wing-tip effects were considered via the vortex- and doublet-lattice methods. Propulsive data were obtained with wind-tunnel tests. This paper describes the numerical models, the two aircraft, and their instrumentation and presents the data collected from the aircraft sensors during flight tests. Numerical and experimental results are compared for angular velocities, accelerations, and strains measured at different points of the aircraft. Despite its limitations and simplifications, the numerical model captures the real aircraft main aeroelastic and flight dynamic behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 304
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] A DOUBLET-LATTICE METHOD FOR CALCULATING LIFT DISTRIBUTIONS ON OSCILLATING SURFACES IN SUBSONIC FLOWS
    ALBANO, E
    RODDEN, WP
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1969, 7 (02) : 279 - &
  • [2] Brown E., 2003, 44 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI [10.2514/6.2003-1715, DOI 10.2514/6.2003-1715]
  • [3] Brown E.L., 2002, 43 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI [10.2514/6.2002-1719, DOI 10.2514/6.2002-1719]
  • [4] Design and flight test of active flutter suppression on the X-56A multi-utility technology test-bed aircraft
    Burnett, E. L.
    Beranek, J. A.
    Holm-Hansen, B. T.
    Atkinson, C. J.
    Flick, P. M.
    [J]. AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 120 (1228) : 893 - 909
  • [5] X-HALE: A Very Flexible Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Tests
    Cesnik, Carlos E. S.
    Senatore, Patrick J.
    Su, Weihua
    Atkins, Ella M.
    Shearer, Christopher M.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (12) : 2820 - 2833
  • [6] Drela M, 1989, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER, V54, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1
  • [7] ESDU, 1987, UND DRAG PRED METH
  • [8] ESDU, 1978, FLUID FORC PRESS MOM
  • [9] ESDU, 2006, INTR INST EFF THRUST
  • [10] ESDU, 2016, INPL FORC MOM INST I