A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Among People Recovering from Mental Illness: A Tailored Mindfulness-Based Intervention versus Relaxation Training

被引:0
作者
Cheng, Yi Ting Daphne [1 ]
Young, Kim Wan Daniel [2 ]
Carlbring, Per [3 ]
Ng, Yat Nam [1 ]
Hung, Suet Lin Shirley [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Social Work, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Social Work, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Psychol, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Mindfulness; self-compassion; mindfulness-based intervention; relaxation; mental illness; mixed methods; SCALE CD-RISC; RESILIENCE SCALE; HONG-KONG; MEDITATION; COMPASSION; STATES; HOPE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; INDIVIDUALS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/26408066.2023.2281418
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis study assessed the potential effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of a tailored mindfulness-based intervention (MBI, REMIND 2.0) for personal recovery among people with mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsIn this pilot mixed methods randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to either the MBI (n = 14) or the relaxation training (RT) (n = 14). Quantitative measures were used to assess primary outcomes, including personal recovery, mindfulness, self-compassion, resilience, and secondary outcomes, including depression, stress, anxiety, positive and negative moods, quality of life and general health at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and one-month follow-up (T2). Quantitative interviews were conducted to explore the experiences and perceptions toward the MBI.ResultsResults indicated significant group and time interactions for all outcomes except anxiety and stress. MBI participants showed significant improvements in all outcomes at T1, which were maintained at T2, except for positive mood. RT participants showed a significant decline in resilience but significant improvements in all secondary outcomes at T1, but all outcomes significantly declined at T2, except for anxiety and stress. MBI participants were receptive toward the programme in all aspects of personal recovery.ConclusionsThe tailored MBI is a potentially effective, feasible and acceptable approach to facilitate personal recovery among people with mental illness. Differences between MBI and RT are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 348
页数:31
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Acharya T, 2017, PSYCHIAT DANUB, V29, pS619
[2]   Buddha philosophy and western psychology [J].
Aich, Tapas Kumar .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 55 (06) :S165-S170
[3]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition, V5th, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[4]  
Astuti H.W.Y., 2020, Nurse Media: Journal of Nursing, V10, P119, DOI DOI 10.14710/NMJN.V10I2.28775
[5]   Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review [J].
Baer, RA .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2003, 10 (02) :125-143
[6]  
Bandura A., 1986, Prentice-Hall Series in Social Learning Theory. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory
[7]   Male Representation in Randomized Clinical Trials of Mindfulness-Based Therapies [J].
Bodenlos, Jamie S. ;
Strang, Katherine ;
Gray-Bauer, Rosalind ;
Faherty, Amanda ;
Ashdown, Brien K. .
MINDFULNESS, 2017, 8 (02) :259-265
[8]  
Braun V., 2021, Thematic Analysis-a practical guide, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-73470-2
[9]   The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being [J].
Brown, KW ;
Ryan, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) :822-848
[10]   Issues and Challenges in the Design of Culturally Adapted Evidence-Based Interventions [J].
Castro, Felipe Gonzalez ;
Barrera, Manuel, Jr. ;
Steiker, Lori K. Holleran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 6, 2010, 6 :213-239