Reliability of the Critical Thinking in Communication Science and Disorders: A Content Specific Critical Thinking Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Morris, Richard J. J. [1 ,4 ]
Gorham-Rowan, Mary M. M. [2 ]
Carter, Matthew D. [2 ]
Battaglia, Dana [3 ]
Olmsted, Lauren M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Valdosta State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders & Special Educ, Valdosta, GA USA
[3] Adelphi Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Garden City, NY USA
[4] Florida State Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, 201 West Bloxham, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
SKILLS; DISPOSITION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1159/000527004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: Students and professionals in communication sciences and disorders (CSD) need to exhibit good critical thinking (CT) skills when engaged in clinical tasks. CSD clinicians must make decisions that are free from biases and support their claim with facts. Thus, CSD clinicians need to be trained to question their clinical practices and to skeptically evaluate new practices that develop. A content specific CT test can help determine if students are developing these skills. However, to date, no such content specific critical thinking assessment exists for CSD. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the current version of a specific content critical thinking assessment, the Critical Thinking in Communication Science and Disorders (CTCSD). Methods: A sample of 150 communication sciences and disorders (CSD) graduate students enrolled in three programs participated. They completed an online Qualtrics survey that consisted of the CTCSD. They completed the Qualtrics survey twice, once at the beginning of a semester and once at the end. The participant responses were independently scored by two research associates. The data were analyzed for reliability in three ways. Intra-subject reliability was assessed by comparing scores across the two testing sessions. Internal consistency of the items to measure a common construct was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the Guttman's Lambda 6. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. In addition, the time used to complete the survey was analyzed. Results: The students from the three programs scored similarly on the CTCSD. High reliability ratings occurred for the intra-subject, internal consistency, and inter-rater measures. Discussion/Conclusion: The results indicate the reliability of the CTCSD. In combination with previous results indicating the face, construct, and criterion validity of the CTCSD, it appears to have psychometric strength. The CTCSD may help academic and clinical faculty select learning activities and focus feedback to their graduate students in order to reinforce skills the students exhibit and to develop other skills.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 89
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of assessment of critical thinking
    Allen, GD
    Rubenfeld, MG
    Scheffer, BK
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2004, 20 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [2] SCIENCE AND CRITICAL THINKING
    Arnold, J.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 50 : 78 - 78
  • [3] Critical thinking abilities assessment tools: reliability generalization
    Mahapoonyanont, Natcha
    Krahomwong, Rewadee
    Kochakornjarupong, Duenpen
    Rachasong, Worawanninee
    INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02): : 434 - 438
  • [4] Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the Russian HEIghten? critical thinking assessment
    Shaw, Amy
    Liu, Ou Lydia
    Gu, Lin
    Kardonova, Elena
    Chirikov, Igor
    Li, Guirong
    Hu, Shangfeng
    Yu, Ningning
    Ma, Liping
    Guo, Fei
    Su, Qi
    Shi, Jinghuan
    Shi, Henry
    Loyalka, Prashant
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (09) : 1933 - 1948
  • [5] Content analysis and critical thinking. An assessment study
    Poce, Antonella
    Corcione, Laura
    Iovine, Annalisa
    CADMO, 2012, 20 (01): : 47 - +
  • [6] Science, method and critical thinking
    Danchin, Antoine
    MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 16 (10): : 1888 - 1894
  • [7] Critical thinking and science education
    Bailin S.
    Science & Education, 2002, 11 (4) : 361 - 375
  • [8] Critical thinking and nursing science
    Malinski, VM
    NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2001, 14 (01) : 14 - 14
  • [9] The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment: Toward a Dutch appraisal of critical thinking
    de Bie, Hannie
    Wilhelm, Pascal
    van der Meij, Hans
    THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2015, 17 : 33 - 44
  • [10] Evaluation of Critical Thinking in an Exercise Science Program with a Standardized Critical Thinking Test
    Dicus, Jeremy R.
    Jensen, Brock T.
    Verba, Steven D.
    Lynn, Jeff S.
    Pierce, Patricia A.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 718 - 718