Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power

被引:87
作者
Blanca, Maria J. [1 ]
Arnau, Jaume [2 ]
Garcia-Castro, F. Javier [1 ]
Alarcon, Rafael [1 ]
Bono, Roser [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Violation of normality; Within-subject design; Robustness; Power; ANOVA; REPEATED-MEASURES DESIGNS; MIXED-MODEL; SPHERICITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; ROBUSTNESS; ANALYZE; TESTS;
D O I
10.7334/psicothema2022.292
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Repeated measures designs are commonly used in health and social sciences research. Although there are other, more advanced, statistical analyses, the F-statistic of repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) remains the most widely used procedure for analyzing differences in means. The impact of the violation of normality has been extensively studied for between-subjects ANOVA, but this is not the case for RM-ANOVA. Therefore, studies that extensively and systematically analyze the robustness of RM-ANOVA under the violation of normality are needed. This paper reports the results of two simulation studies aimed at analyzing the Type I error and power of RM-ANOVA when the normality assumption is violated but sphericity is fulfilled. Method: Study 1 considered 20 distributions, both known and unknown, and we manipulated the number of repeated measures (3, 4, 6, and 8) and sample size (from 10 to 300). Study 2 involved unequal distributions in each repeated measure. The distributions analyzed represent slight, moderate, and severe deviation from normality. Results: Overall, the results show that the Type I error and power of the F-statistic are not altered by the violation of normality. Conclusions: RM-ANOVA is generally robust to non-normality when the sphericity assumption is met.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
[3]   Recommendations for analysis of repeated-measures designs: testing and correcting for sphericity and use of manova and mixed model analysis [J].
Armstrong, Richard A. .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2017, 37 (05) :585-593
[4]   Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions? [J].
Arnau, Jaume ;
Bendayan, Rebecca ;
Blanca, Maria J. ;
Bono, Roser .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (03) :408-429
[5]   Using the linear mixed model to analyze nonnormal data distributions in longitudinal designs [J].
Arnau, Jaume ;
Bono, Roser ;
Blanca, Mara J. ;
Bendayan, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 44 (04) :1224-1238
[6]   Greenhouse-Geisser Adjustment and the ANOVA-Type Statistic: Cousins or Twins? [J].
Bathke, Arne C. ;
Schabenberger, Oliver ;
Tobias, Randall D. ;
Madden, Laurence V. .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2009, 63 (03) :239-246
[7]   Comparison of the procedures of Fleishman and Ramberg et al. for generating non-normal data in simulation studies [J].
Bendayan, Rebecca ;
Arnau, Jaime ;
Blanca, Maria J. ;
Bono, Roser .
ANALES DE PSICOLOGIA, 2014, 30 (01) :365-372
[8]   Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measure designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations [J].
Berkovits, I ;
Hancock, GR ;
Nevitt, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (06) :877-892
[9]  
Blanca M.J., 2004, PSICOTHEMA, V16, P509
[10]   Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed? [J].
Blanca, Maria J. ;
Alarcon, Rafael ;
Bono, Roser .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9