Regional accessibility of higher education in Russia

被引:1
作者
Prakhov, Ilya [1 ]
Bugakova, Polina [1 ]
机构
[1] HSE Univ, Ctr Inst Studies, Moscow, Russia
关键词
higher education; accessibility of higher education; regional educational markets; the Unified State Exam; urban; rural students; STUDENT PRICE RESPONSE; SOCIAL-CLASS; CLASS DIFFERENTIALS; SCHOOL RESOURCES; ACCESS; INEQUALITY; PARTICIPATION; UNIVERSITY; COLLEGE; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/01425692.2023.2167700
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Despite the unified system of admission to universities in Russia, applicants can still face unequal access to higher education. This article analyzes the barriers which restrict the inter-regional accessibility of higher education. We propose an analytical model, reflecting the direct and indirect influence of family, schools, and location on the educational strategies of youth, assuming that these factors affect the university enrollment both directly and indirectly through academic achievement. An empirical examination of the model, based on data from the longitudinal study 'Trajectories in Education and Careers', shows that students from Moscow are most likely to enroll at university, since they face the lowest barriers. The problem of the accessibility of higher education is more acute for residents of large cities or regional capitals: their likelihood of matriculating is limited by cognitive abilities, socio-economic status, and school characteristics. Residents of small towns or villages are facing the highest barriers and gender inequality.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 583
页数:26
相关论文
共 91 条
[31]   Where they go, what they do and why it matters: the importance of geographic accessibility and social class for decisions relating to higher education institution type, degree level and field of study [J].
Flannery, D. ;
Cullinan, J. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (24) :2952-2965
[32]   Access to college and university: Does distance to school matter? [J].
Frenette, M .
CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 2004, 30 (04) :427-443
[33]   Too Far to Go On? Distance to School and University Participation [J].
Frenette, Marc .
EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2006, 14 (01) :31-58
[34]   Geography, choice and participation in higher education in England [J].
Gibbons, Stephen ;
Vignoles, Anna .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (1-2) :98-113
[35]   The role of parental social class, education and unemployment on child cognitive development [J].
Gonzalez, Llucia ;
Cortes-Sancho, Rosa ;
Murcia, Mario ;
Ballester, Ferran ;
Rebagliato, Marisa ;
Liliana Rodriguez-Bernal, Clara .
GACETA SANITARIA, 2020, 34 (01) :51-60
[36]   Those Who Choose and Those Who Don't: Social Background and College Orientation [J].
Grodsky, Eric ;
Riegle-Crumb, Catherine .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2010, 627 :14-35
[37]  
Gromov A. D., 2016, NATSIONALNYY ISSLEDO, V32
[38]  
Hanushek EA, 1997, EDUC EVAL POLICY AN, V19, P141, DOI 10.2307/1164207
[39]   CONCEPTUAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES IN THE ESTIMATION OF EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS [J].
HANUSHEK, EA .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1979, 14 (03) :351-388
[40]  
Hanushek EA, 2017, METHOD EDUC MEAS, P149, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_8