Healthcare cost coverage inequality and its impact on hypertension and diabetes: A five-year follow-up study in a Malaysian rural community

被引:0
作者
Folayan, Adeola [1 ]
Fatt, Quek Kia [2 ]
Cheong, Mark Wing Loong [3 ]
Su, Tin Tin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ Malaysia, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, South East Asia Community Observ SEACO, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ Malaysia, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Global Publ Hlth, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Monash Univ Malaysia, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, South East Asia Community Observ SEACO, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
healthcare cost coverage; hypertension and diabetes; inequality; private health insurance; MORAL HAZARD; RISK-FACTORS; INSURANCE; INEQUITIES; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1002/hsr2.1880
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background and AimsInequality in health care access is a socioeconomic driver for non-communicable disease related risk factors. This study examined the inequality trend in healthcare cost coverage (HCC) compared to private health insurance (PHI) coverage, a subtype of HCC, over 5 years. The study will also determine the association between HCC (and PHI) and the status of hypertension and diabetes diagnosis.MethodThe rich-poor ratio, concentration curve and concentration index were derived to determine the level of inequality. Furthermore, logistic regression was done to determine the association between HCC and the status of hypertension and diabetes.ResultsThe PHI group (rich-poor ratio: 1.4 [rich: 454, poor: 314] and 2.6 [rich: 375, poor: 142]; concentration index: 0.123 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.093-0.153] and 0.144 [95% CI: 0.109-0.178] in 2013 and 2018, respectively) has relatively higher inequality compared with the HCC group (rich-poor ratio: 0.9 [rich: 307, poor: 337] and 1.1 [rich: 511, poor: 475]; concentration index: -0.027 [95% CI: -0.053 to -0.000] and -0.014 [95% CI: -0.033 to 0.006] in 2013 and 2018, receptively). Contrasting to the observation with the HCC group, PHI was associated with higher odds for hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.252, p = 0.01, 95% CI: 1.051-1.493) and diabetes (aOR = 1.287, p = 0.02, 95% CI: 1.041-1.590) in 2018.ConclusionOver 5 years, the inequality in PHI coverage remained higher compared with HCC, which suggests that the rich enjoyed private healthcare more. Furthermore, those with PHI were more likely to report known hypertension and diabetes in 2018. It is reasonable to assume that those with PHI are more likely to have earlier diagnoses compared to others and are more likely to be aware of their condition. Policymakers need to identify strategies that can narrow the existing gap in quality and type of service between the private and public health sectors. There was inequality in PHI coverage over 5 years, suggesting that the rich enjoyed private healthcare more. Those with PHI were more likely to report known hypertension and diabetes in 2018. It is reasonable to assume that those with PHI are more likely to have earlier diagnoses compared to others and are more likely to be aware of their condition. The findings in this study could reinforce the need for policymakers to identify possible strategies to narrow the existing gap in quality and type of service between the private and public health sectors.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Aljunid SM., 2019, bioRxiv
[2]   Private Health Insurance in Malaysia: Who Is Left Behind? [J].
Balqis-Ali, Nur Zahirah ;
Anis-Syakira, Jailani ;
Fun, Weng Hong ;
Sararaks, Sondi .
ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 33 (08) :861-869
[3]   Bundling Health Insurance and Microfinance in India: There Cannot be Adverse Selection if There Is No Demand [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Hornbeck, Richard .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (05) :291-297
[4]   Examining the level and inequality in health insurance coverage in 36 sub-Saharan African countries [J].
Barasa, Edwine ;
Kazungu, Jacob ;
Nguhiu, Peter ;
Ravishankar, Nirmala .
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (04)
[5]   Measuring Socioeconomic Inequality in Obesity: Looking Beyond the Obesity Threshold [J].
Bilger, Marcel ;
Kruger, Eliza J. ;
Finkelstein, Eric A. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (08) :1052-1066
[6]   Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Moral hazard and adverse selection [J].
Boone, Jan .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2015, 128 :50-58
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF HEALTH INSURANCE STABILITY ON RACIAL/ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN DIABETES CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT [J].
Brown, Alison G. M. ;
Kressin, Nancy ;
Terrin, Norma ;
Hanchate, Amresh ;
Suzukida, Jillian ;
Kher, Sucharita ;
Price, Lori Lyn ;
LeClair, Amy M. ;
Krzyszczyk, Danielle ;
Byhoff, Elena ;
Freund, Karen M. .
ETHNICITY & DISEASE, 2021, 31 (01) :149-158
[8]   Non-communicable Disease Surveillance in Malaysia: An Overview of Existing Systems and Priorities Going Forward [J].
Chandran, Arunah ;
Kumar, Shurendar Selva ;
Hairi, Noran Naqiah ;
Low, Wah Yun ;
Mustapha, Feisul Idzwan .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 9
[9]   Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries [J].
Devaux, Marion .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2015, 16 (01) :21-33
[10]   HOW HEALTH INSURANCE AFFECTS HEALTH CARE DEMANDA STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIORAL MORAL HAZARD AND ADVERSE SELECTION [J].
Dong, Yingying .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2013, 51 (02) :1324-1344